Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160580›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

Evaluation of an eating disorder screening and care pathway implementation in a general mental health private inpatient setting.

Amy Kaplan, Anastasia Hutchinson, Suzie Hooper, Karen Gwee, Damien Khaw, Lola Valent, Jane C Willcox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy KaplanEpworth HealthCare Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Camberwell, Australia. amy.kaplan@epworth.org.au.
Anastasia HutchinsonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research (QPS), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Suzie HooperEpworth HealthCare Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Camberwell, Australia.
Karen GweeEpworth HealthCare Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Camberwell, Australia.
Damien KhawSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research (QPS), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Lola ValentEpworth HealthCare Rehabilitation and Mental Health, Camberwell, Australia.
Jane C WillcoxSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research (QPS), Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral mental health inpatient units hold a valuable place in the stepped system of care, and for identification and treatment of people with eating disorders (EDs) or disordered eating behaviours (DEBs). This study aimed to pragmatically evaluate an evidence-informed screening and care pathway, alongside a staff education program, implemented to improve identification and treatment access for consumers with EDs and DEBs, with co-occurring psychiatric conditions, on a general mental health ward.

methodsA mixed methodology design was mapped to the RE-AIM implementation framework. It encompassed medical record audits across two 3-month time points pre and post implementation of the pathway, and key informant consumer and health professional interviews.

resultsProcess and implementation data were compared for three-month periods pre (2019, n = 348) and post-implementation (2021, n = 284). Post-implementation, intake SCOFF screening occurred in 94.7% of admissions. People with ED/DEBs diagnoses were 35 times more likely to have a SCOFF score ≥ 2 (OR = 35.2, p < .001) with the odds of identifying previously undiagnosed DEBs 3.3 times greater (p = .002). Post-implementation, for those with an ED/DEB, dietitian referrals (p < .001) and micronutrient supplementation (p = .013) were more likely. For those with weight and height data, both absolute (-1.1 kg ± 2.2 vs. 1.3 kg ± 2.3; p < .001) and percentage weight change were significantly higher post-implementation with similarities across BMI categories. Universally, consumers and health professionals expressed that the service had "changed care for the better" encouraging therapeutic relationships, mediated by trust, that resulted in better consumer outcomes. 50 health professionals undertook tailored ED and meal support therapy education. They noted that their knowledge and confidence improved allowing value to be seen in understanding EDs and the role for care within general mental health.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that an articulated screening and care pathway could be feasibly implemented in general mental health. The evaluation demonstrated advances in ED detection and management with noted improvements in management access, care planning, physical monitoring and weight gain outcomes. Understanding stakeholders' experiences of new care practices enabled the identification of enablers and barriers for implementation, and avenues to optimise care for consumers with EDs in the general mental health setting.

Indexed as

Care pathwaysDisordered eating behavioursEating disordersImplementationScreening

Identifiers

PMID39160580
PMCPMC11334319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.