ArticleBMC health services research2024
Second-line pharmacotherapy intensification after metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide register study from Finland during 2011-2022.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this nationwide register study, we examined the initiation of a second-line antidiabetic medicine (ADM) among new patients receiving regular metformin monotherapy in Finland during 2011-2022. We also reflected the second-line treatment patterns on changes in the reimbursement policy, and the national type 2 diabetes (T2D) care guidelines.
methodsUsing register data on all reimbursed ADM purchases during 2010-2022, we defined nine annual cohorts of patients initiating regular metformin monotherapy during 2011-2019, each with a three-year follow-up. Descriptive methods were used to study the patterns of metformin monotherapy and second-line intensification over time. Proportional hazards models were used to analyse the take-up of the second-line ADM.
resultsThe share of new patients initiating metformin use (11-13% of all metformin users) and regular metformin use (83-85% of all new metformin users) remained stable. In all cohorts, 16-19% of the patients took up a second-line ADM (median time to intensification 1.5 years). With the 2011 cohort as reference, the highest proportion of new regular metformin users taking up a second ADM (hazard ratio 1.12. 95% confidence interval 1.07 ; 1.16, P < .0001) was in the 2019 cohort. In the 2017 cohort, the proportion of patients initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as second-line treatment surpassed those initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. The reimbursement policy restricted the use of GLP-1-analogues.
conclusionsSecond-line treatment intensification patterns over time paralleled the changes in the reimbursement system. Thus, our findings suggest that the reimbursement policy may influence the use of ADMs in Finland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.