Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160541›Full record

ReviewVirology journal2024

The potential use of bacteriophages as antibacterial agents against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Omid Gholizadeh, Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin Ghaleh, Mahdi Tat, Reza Ranjbar, Ruhollah Dorostkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Isolation and Characterization of aAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. <p>Molecular medicine reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phage therapy againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Co-evolution of resistance and virulence inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Chitosan/PEO Nanofibers as a Delivery Platform for Sustained Release ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Characterization and Genomic Analysis of a New BacteriophageAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Isolation and characterization of a novel phage targeting Klebsiella pneumoniae K2 capsular type.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Isolation of Lytic Bacteriophages ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omid GholizadehStudent Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hadi Esmaeili Gouvarchin GhalehApplied Virology Research Center, Biomedicine Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdi TatApplied Virology Research Center, Biomedicine Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza RanjbarMolecular Biology Research Center, Biomedicine Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ruhollah DorostkarApplied Virology Research Center, Biomedicine Technologies Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. r.dorost@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most common bacteria that cause nosocomial infections is Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumoniae), especially in patients who are very sick and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The frequency of multi-drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (MDRKP) has dramatically increased worldwide in recent decades, posing an urgent threat to public health. The Western world's bacteriophage (phage) studies have been revitalized due to the increasing reports of antimicrobial resistance and the restricted development and discovery of new antibiotics. These factors have also spurred innovation in other scientific domains. The primary agent in phage treatment is an obligately lytic organism (called bacteriophage) that kills the corresponding bacterial host while sparing human cells and lessening the broader effects of antibiotic usage on commensal bacteria. Phage treatment is developing quickly, leading to many clinical studies and instances of life-saving medicinal use. In addition, phage treatment has a few immunological adverse effects and consequences in addition to its usefulness. Since K. pneumoniae antibiotic resistance has made treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections challenging, phage therapy (PT) has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy. The effectiveness of phages has also been investigated in K. pneumoniae biofilms and animal infection models. Compared with antibiotics, PT exhibits numerous advantages, including a particular lysis spectrum, co-evolution with bacteria to avoid the emergence of phage resistance, and a higher abundance and diversity of phage resources than found in antibiotics. Moreover, phages are eliminated in the absence of a host bacterium, which makes them the only therapeutic agent that self-regulates at the sites of infection. Therefore, it is essential to pay attention to the role of PT in treating these infections. This study summarizes the state of knowledge on Klebsiella spp. phages and provides an outlook on the development of phage-based treatments that target K. pneumoniae in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriophagesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaePhage TherapyAnimalsCross InfectionDisease Models, AnimalHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialAntibiotic residentBacteriophagesKlebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID39160541
PMCPMC11334591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.