Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160535›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Radiology education for medical students: a qualitative exploration of educational topics, teaching methods and future strategies.

Frederike S Harthoorn, Sascha W J Scharenborg, Monique Brink, Liesbeth Peters-Bax, Dylan Henssen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. MEDI-SLATE: medical imaging slide-lecture aligned teaching ensemble.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frederike S HarthoornRadboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sascha W J ScharenborgRadboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Monique BrinkDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth Peters-BaxDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dylan HenssenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 22, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Dylan.Henssen@radboudumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImaging techniques play a central role in modern medicine and therefore it would be beneficial for all medical students to incorporate radiology education in medical school curricula. However, a formal undergraduate radiology curriculum with well-defined learning objectives remains lacking in The Netherlands. This study aims to qualitatively ascertain opinions from clinicians (radiologists and non-radiologists) with regard to radiology education in the medical school curricula, including topics, teaching methods and strategies.

methodsA qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews was conducted. Inclusion was carried out until saturation was achieved, after which 2 additional interviews were held. Interviews were conducted using open-ended questions, following a predefined topic list. The constant comparative method was applied in order to include new questions when unexpected topics arose during the interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded using a thematic analysis approach. Codes were organized into categories and themes by discussion between the researchers.

resultsForty-four clinicians were interviewed (8 radiologists, 36 non-radiologists). The three main themes that were derived from the interviews were: (1) expectations of indispensable knowledge and skills on radiology, (2) organization of radiology education within the medical curriculum and (3) promising educational innovations for the radiology curriculum. The qualitative study design provides more in-depth knowledge on clinicians' views on educational topics.

conclusionsThe themes and statements of this study provided new insights into educational methods, timing of radiology education and new topics to teach. More research is needed to gain consensus on these subjects and inclusion of the opinion of medical students with regard to radiology education is needed.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduateQualitative ResearchRadiologyStudents, MedicalAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsTeachingMedical educationMedical school curriculumQualitative researchRadiology education

Identifiers

PMID39160535
PMCPMC11334451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.