Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160520›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

First insights of integrating the Bonn Internship Curriculum for Point-of-Care Ultrasound (BI-POCUS): progress and educational aspects.

Elena Höhne, Valentin Sebastian Schäfer, Simon Michael Petzinna, Agnes Wittek, Jennifer Gotta, Philipp Reschke, Florian Recker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elena HöhneDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Valentin Sebastian SchäferDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Clinic of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Simon Michael PetzinnaDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Clinic of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Agnes WittekDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jennifer GottaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Philipp ReschkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. florian.recker@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is rapidly gaining prominence in various clinical settings. As its use becomes more widespread, there is a growing need for comprehensive ultrasound training in medical education to ensure that future healthcare professionals are proficient in this essential diagnostic tool.

objectiveThis study is the first attempt by the University of Bonn to seamlessly integrate ultrasound courses and the use of ultrasound devices into the regular activities of final year medical students and to evaluate the usage of these devices.

methodsA total of forty students in their practical year were provided with a hendheld ultrasound device for a period of four months. During this time, they were invited to take part in eight optional ultrasound courses in which they acquired images and those images were rated using a specially developed rating system. At the end of the tertial, students were able to take part in a voluntary survey on the use of the equipment.

resultsParticipation in the optional ultrasound courses was well received, with the Introduction and FAST module drawing the largest number of participants (29). Among the ultrasound images acquired by students, those of the lungs obtaining the highest rating, with 18.82 (SD ± 4.30) points out of 23 points, while the aorta and vena cava images scored lowest, with an average of 16.62 (SD ± 1.55) points. The overall mean score for all images was 17.47 (SD ± 2.74). Only 21 students responded to the survey. Of the participating students, 67% used the device independently four times or fewer during the tertial.

conclusionThe study aimed to enhance the BI-POCUS curriculum by improving students' ultrasound skills during their practical year. However, device usage was lower than expected, with most students using it only once a month or less. This raises concerns about the justification of the effort and resources. Future initiatives will focus on technical improvements, better login data provision, and closer monitoring of usage and progress, emphasizing the need for practical ultrasound training in medical education.

Indexed as

CurriculumPoint-of-Care SystemsUltrasonographyClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansInternship and ResidencyStudents, MedicalCurriculum DevelopmentEducationTrainingUltrasoundUndergraduate Education

Identifiers

PMID39160520
PMCPMC11334524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.