Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160500›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Deep learning based uterine fibroid detection in ultrasound images.

Haibin Xi, Wenjing Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haibin XiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 382, Wuyi Road, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan City, 030001, Shanxi Province, China. Xhb4295@163.com.
Wenjing WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No. 382, Wuyi Road, Xinghualing District, Taiyuan City, 030001, Shanxi Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine fibroids are common benign tumors originating from the uterus's smooth muscle layer, often leading to symptoms such as pelvic pain, and reproductive issues. Early detection is crucial to prevent complications such as infertility or the need for invasive treatments like hysterectomy. One of the main challenges in diagnosing uterine fibroids is the lack of specific symptoms, which can mimic other gynecological conditions. This often leads to under-diagnosis or misdiagnosis, delaying appropriate management. In this research, an attention based fine-tuned EfficientNetB0 model is proposed for the classification of uterine fibroids from ultrasound images. Attention mechanisms, permit the model to focus on particular parts of an image and move forward the model's execution by empowering it to specifically go to imperative highlights whereas overlooking irrelevant ones. The proposed approach has used a total of 1990 images divided into two classes: Non-uterine fibroid and uterine fibroid. The data augmentation methods have been connected to improve generalization and strength by exposing it to a wider range of varieties within the training data. The proposed model has obtained the value of accuracy as 0.99. Future research should focus on improving the accuracy and efficiency of diagnostic techniques, as well as evaluating their effectiveness in diverse populations with higher sensitivity and specificity for the detection of uterine fibroids, as well as biomarkers to aid in diagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLeiomyomaUltrasonographyUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityAttention mechanismClassificationEfficientNetB0FibroidsUltrasoundUterine

Identifiers

PMID39160500
PMCPMC11331772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.