Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160419›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2025

State of the Science: Health Care Provider Communication of Cannabis Use Among Adults Living with Cancer.

Amrit Baral, Bria-Necole A Diggs, Judith Greengold, Cynthia Foronda, Debbie Anglade, Marlene Camacho-Rivera, Jessica Y Islam, Denise C Vidot

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cannabis use and perceptions among rural and urban cancer patients and survivors from a Pennsylvania cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amrit BaralDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. axb2538@miami.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-9665
Bria-Necole A DiggsDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Judith GreengoldSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Cynthia ForondaSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Debbie AngladeSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Marlene Camacho-RiveraSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA.
Jessica Y IslamMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Denise C VidotDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite medicinal cannabis gaining popularity for managing symptoms in cancer patients, a knowledge gap exists in patient-provider communication crucial for monitoring outcomes, optimizing dosing, and educating healthcare providers to integrate cannabis into treatment plans. Our goal is to understand communication dynamics, identify gaps, and pave the way for effective cannabis communication for individuals living with cancer (PLWC). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSCO for articles published between 2013 and July 2023, capturing the key concepts of cannabis use in cancer patients and their communication with healthcare providers in oncology settings. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement guided the review. Studies were appraised by applying the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model for Nursing and Healthcare Professionals. Of the 2384 articles reviewed, 14 met the inclusion criteria. Three were qualitative studies, and 11 were cross-sectional surveys. All studies were level III evidence. Studies captured patients' and providers' perspectives; five were conducted among cancer patients, and nine were among healthcare providers in oncology settings. Findings revealed variations in healthcare provider recommendations, patient-initiated discussions, and barriers to discussing medical cannabis (MC). The synthesis of this evidence highlights the complexities surrounding MC in oncology settings, including knowledge gaps among healthcare providers, patient-initiated discussions, and challenges in accessing and prescribing medicinal cannabis. This review contributes valuable insights into the current landscape of MC use in cancer care, emphasizing the need for improved communication, education, and support for both patients and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PersonnelMedical MarijuanaNeoplasmsAdultHumansMedical MarijuanaCancerCannabisCommunicationPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID39160419
PMCPMC12177019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.