Lipiodol Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Genicular Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Study on Safety and Clinical Success.

purposeThis study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of genicular artery embolization (GAE) using lipiodol in comparison to imipenem/cilastatin (IPM-CS). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study screened patients who underwent GAE between January 2022 and February 2023 for inclusion. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-procedure using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for pain, stiffness, functional capacity, and total scores. Technical and clinical success rates, complications, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed.

resultsA total of 42 patients were included in the study, with 13 patients treated with lipiodol and 29 with IPM-CS for GAE. Transient skin discoloration was noted in 23.1% of lipiodol patients and 31% of the IPM-CS group (p = 0.722). One patient (7.6%) in the lipiodol group developed knee edema and erythema due to drug-induced vasculitis (p = 0.309). Clinical success rates in the lipiodol group were 76.9% at 1 month, consistent at 3 months, and 69.2% at 6 months. For the IPM-CS group, success rates were 89.7, 86.2, and 75.9%, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.353, p = 0.657, p = 0.713). The median percentage change in WOMAC stiffness scores for the lipiodol group at 1, 3, and 6 months post-GAE were - 25%, - 16.7%, and - 16.7%, respectively, while the IPM-CS group showed decreases of - 40%, - 50%, and - 50%. Significant differences were found between the groups at all time points (p = 0.017, p = 0.009, and p = 0.002, respectively).

conclusionLipiodol shows comparable clinical success to IPM-CS in GAE.