SynthesisDrug safety2024
A Comparison of Active Pharmacovigilance Strategies Used to Monitor Adverse Events to Antiviral Agents: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Pharmacists in Tackling Mpox: Challenges and Future Prospects: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Curcumin in oral health: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and delivery strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe safety of antiviral agents in real-world clinical settings is crucial, as pre-marketing studies often do not capture all adverse events (AE). Active pharmacovigilance strategies are essential for detecting and characterising these AE comprehensively.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and characterise active pharmacovigilance strategies used in real-world clinical settings for patients under systemic antiviral agents, focusing on the frequency of AE and the clinical data sources used.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review by searching three electronic bibliographic databases targeting observational prospective active pharmacovigilance studies, phase IV clinical trials for post-marketing safety surveillance, and interventional studies assessing active pharmacovigilance strategies, focusing on individuals exposed to systemic antiviral agents.
resultsWe included 36 primary studies, predominantly using Drug Event Monitoring (DEM), with a minority employing sentinel sites and registries. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was the most common condition, with the majority using DEM. Within the DEM, there was a wide range of incidences of patients experiencing at least one AE, and most of these studies used one or two data sources. Sentinel site studies were less common, with two on hepatitis C virus (HCV) and one on HIV, each relying on one or two data sources. The single study using a registry focusing on HIV therapy reported using just one data source. Patient interviews were the most common data source, followed by medical records and laboratory tests. The quality of the studies was considered 'good' in 18/36, 'fair' in 1/36, and 'poor' in 17/36 studies.
conclusionDEM was the predominant pharmacovigilance strategy, employing multiple data sources, and appears to increase the likelihood of detecting higher AE incidence. Establishing such a framework would facilitate a more detailed and consistent approach across different studies and settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.