Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160322›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2024

Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.

Yiqing Lu, John Rinzel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yiqing LuCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-7834
John RinzelCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA. rinzeljm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6803-9425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firing rate models for describing the mean-field activities of neuronal ensembles can be used effectively to study network function and dynamics, including synchronization and rhythmicity of excitatory-inhibitory populations. However, traditional Wilson-Cowan-like models, even when extended to include an explicit dynamic synaptic activation variable, are found unable to capture some dynamics such as Interneuronal Network Gamma oscillations (ING). Use of an explicit delay is helpful in simulations at the expense of complicating mathematical analysis. We resolve this issue by introducing a dynamic variable, u, that acts as an effective delay in the negative feedback loop between firing rate (r) and synaptic gating of inhibition (s). In effect, u endows synaptic activation with second order dynamics. With linear stability analysis, numerical branch-tracking and simulations, we show that our r-u-s rate model captures some key qualitative features of spiking network models for ING. We also propose an alternative formulation, a v-u-s model, in which mean membrane potential v satisfies an averaged current-balance equation. Furthermore, we extend the framework to E-I networks. With our six-variable v-u-s model, we demonstrate in firing rate models the transition from Pyramidal-Interneuronal Network Gamma (PING) to ING by increasing the external drive to the inhibitory population without adjusting synaptic weights. Having PING and ING available in a single network, without invoking synaptic blockers, is plausible and natural for explaining the emergence and transition of two different types of gamma oscillations.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsGamma RhythmModels, NeurologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansInterneuronsNerve NetNeural InhibitionNeural Networks, ComputerNeuronsPyramidal CellsSynapsesFiring rate modelGamma oscillationINGPING

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.