Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160313›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Initial case series experience with robotic-assisted transanal minimally invasive surgery performed with da Vinci single-port system for the excision of rectal cancer.

Ji Su Woo, Min Jeng Cho, In Kyu Park, Yeong Cheol Im, Gyu Yeol Kim, Dong Jin Park, Songsoo Yang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Robotic surgery (R-TAMIS): a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ji Su Woo *Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0009-0009-9988-9260
Min Jeng Cho *Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5247-2606
In Kyu ParkDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3807-8917
Yeong Cheol ImDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8988-103X
Gyu Yeol KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5389-160X
Dong Jin ParkDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7820-9179
Songsoo YangDepartment of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, 15, Daehakbyeongwon-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, South Korea. ssyang913@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-8723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is widely used for rectal lesion excision. Robot-assisted TA TAMIS (R-TAMIS) may improve surgical ergonomics. The introduction of the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robot, designed for endoluminal surgery, has brought new possibilities. Our primary objective herein was to assess the technical and oncological feasibility and efficacy of Single-port robotic TAMIS (SPR-TAMIS) in rectal cancer excision. The secondary objective was to analyze the perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included 14 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent SPR-TAMIS between April 2021 and February 2023. Patient data, surgical details, and clinical outcome data were collected to assess the safety and feasibility of SPR-TAMIS.

resultsThe median participant age was 72 years, and full-thickness excision was performed without specimen fragmentation in all cases. The median tumor diameter was 2.7 cm, positioned between 10 cm proximally and 7 cm distally from the anal verge. Negative margins were achieved in 93% of cases, with one case requiring further resection. The median operative time was 175 min, and the median hospital stay was 5 days. No intraoperative conversion from SPR-TAMIS to laparoscopic or conventional transanal excision was required. No mortalities or major postoperative complications occurred; however, one patient (7.1%) experienced minor morbidity manifesting as wound dehiscence (Clavien-Dindo grade I). No recurrence was observed during the 24-month follow-up.

conclusionsIn our early experience, SPR-TAMIS is a safe and feasible surgery for selected early stage rectal cancers, offering enhanced visualization and stable maneuverability transanally. This platform may have potential advantages for the excision of larger or more proximal lesions.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeExcision; rectal cancerSingle-port robotTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.