Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160303›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

Risk factors for and treatment of anastomotic strictures after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Sophie L F Doran, Maria G Digby, Sophie V Green, Clive J Kelty, Anand P Tamhankar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06662513 (An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06662513 not yet recruitingnot on this map

An Australian Regional Hospital's Oesophagectomy Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorLaunceston General HospitalRan2024 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsOesophageal CancerArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie L F DoranDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2489-135X
Maria G DigbyDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Sophie V GreenDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Clive J KeltyDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK.
Anand P TamhankarDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S5 7AU, UK. a.tamhankar@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnastomotic strictures following esophagectomy occur frequently and impact on nutrition and quality of life. Although strictures are often attributed to ischemia and anastomotic leaks, the role of anastomosis size and pyloroplasty is not well evaluated. Our study aims to assess the rate of and risk factors for anastomotic stricture following esophagectomy, and the impact of treatment with regular endoscopic balloon dilatations.

methodsConsecutive patients (n = 207) undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy performed by two surgeons at our institution were included. Data on patient demographics, surgical outcomes and anastomotic strictures were recorded. Relationship of anastomotic strictures with circular stapler size, pyloroplasty and anastomotic leak was analyzed. Treatment of strictures with endoscopic balloon dilatation was reviewed and percentage weight loss at 1 year was evaluated.

resultsAnastomotic strictures occurred in 17.4% of patients. Patient demographics between those with and without stricture were similar. Stricture rate was similar in patients with or without pyloroplasty (13.9% vs 21.7%, respectively, p = 0.14) and in those with or without an anastomotic leak (25.0% vs 16.6%, respectively, p = 0.345). Stricture risk increased with smaller sized stapler (25 mm = 33.3%, 28 mm = 15.3%, 31 mm = 4.8%; p = 0.027). The median number of dilatations required to fully treat strictures was 2 (IQR: 1-3). The median length of time from surgery to first dilatation was 2.9 months (IQR: 2.0-4.7) and to last dilatation was 6.1 months (IQR: 4.8-10.0). Median maximum dilatation diameter was 20 mm (IQR: 18.0-20.0). There were no complications from dilatations. Percentage weight loss at 1 year in patients with strictures was similar to those without strictures (8.7% vs 11.1%, respectively, p = 0.090).

conclusionsPost-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures are common and not necessarily related to anastomotic leaks or absence of pyloroplasty. Smaller anastomosis size was strongly linked with stricture formation. A driven approach with regular endoscopic balloon dilation is safe and effective in treating these strictures with no excess weight loss at 1 year once treated.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalEsophageal StenosisEsophagectomyAgedAnastomotic LeakDilatationEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnastomotic strictureEsophagectomyWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID39160303
PMCPMC11525324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.