Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Unsteady CFD simulation of a rotor blade under various wind conditions.

Sa Kasmaiee, Si Kasmaiee, A Farshad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sa KasmaieeDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Si KasmaieeDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. siroos.kasmaiee@aut.ac.ir.
A FarshadMechatronics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wind and gusts can significantly impact the performance of rotors and turbines. The transient behavior of the rotor should be carefully examined to account for these effects. This paper investigates the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics of a rotor blade under different wind conditions, such as direction, speed, and angle. A 3D transient Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation using the dynamic mesh technique is performed to analyze the rotor dynamics. The unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations with the k-ω SST turbulence model are solved. The rotor blade used for this study is the U15XXL Combo KV29 industrial blade, which has not been numerically analyzed before. The results show that wind in the same direction as the rotation reduces the thrust more than lateral or opposite wind. Lateral wind with a speed lower than 5 m/s decreases the blade performance, but higher speeds increase it. Higher lateral wind speeds also cause two peaks in the torque curve, forming a butterfly wing shape in the polar torque plot and multiple extrema in the torque curve with increasing speed. The maximum thrust shifts slightly to the left with increasing lateral wind speed. The lateral angle does not affect the average thrust produced in one blade revolution but only causes a spatial shift. The thrust production decreases as the angle approaches the opposite direction of rotation. The motion amplitude decreases, and the curve becomes smoother as this angle increases. A nearly straight line similar to no side wind is observed at 60 and 90 degrees, which is attributed to the constant effective angle of attack during the rotation cycle.

Indexed as

Computational fluid dynamicsIncoming lateral and longitudinal windRenewable energyRotor blade simulationTransient simulationUnsteady aerodynamics

Identifiers

PMID39160265
PMCPMC11333752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.