ArticleScientific reports2024
Acoustic modulation signal recognition based on endpoint detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact Localization System of CFRP Structure Based on EFPI Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The modulation recognition technology for acoustic signals holds significant research importance in signal demodulation and communication signal reconnaissance, serving as a crucial component and key aspect. This paper investigates the modulation recognition technology for acoustic signals (< 20 kHz) from the perspectives of signal preprocessing and feature extraction. Firstly, it selects seven modulation signals 2ASK, 4ASK, 2FSK, 4FSK, 2PSK, 4PSK, and OFDM as recognition targets and systematically compares the effectiveness of four different endpoint detection algorithms in modulation signal recognition. To further enhance the performance of the short-time energy entropy ratio algorithm, this study introduces three different noise reduction algorithms for optimization. Finally, to accurately identify and distinguish between 2 and 4FSK signals, this study optimizes the related algorithms of the cyclic spectrum by using the kurtosis coefficient value Kur of the cyclic spectrum parameter matrix when the cyclic frequency α = 0 to differentiate between these two signals. The results show that at SNR of 4 dB, the proposed modulation recognition algorithm can effectively distinguish between these two signals, achieving a recognition accuracy of over 99%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.