Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160241›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Finite element analysis of fixation stability according to reduction position for internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures.

Cheol-Jeong Kim, Jung Sub Lee, Tae Sik Goh, Won Chul Shin, Chiseung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of the Dynamic Cut-Out Failure Modes of Common Proximal Femoral Fixation Devices Using a Mesh-Free Computational Method.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Which side should be taken care of when positioning a lag screw in intertrochanteric femoral fracture: right or left?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Observational
  7. Review
  8. Simulation and validation of spinal construct testing based on ASTM F1717.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cheol-Jeong KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, and University Research Park, Pusan National University, Busan, 46241, Republic of Korea.
Jung Sub LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea.
Tae Sik GohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea.
Won Chul ShinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, 50612, Republic of Korea. dreami3e5t@pusan.ac.kr.
Chiseung LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea. victorich@pusan.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2B5B01087440National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1G1A1013401National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1I1A1A01059922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, finite element analysis (FEA) has been instrumental in comparing the biomechanical stability of various implants for femur fracture treatment and in studying the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical techniques. This analysis has proven helpful for enhancing clinical treatment outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to numerically analyze fixed stability according to location using FEA. In this study, a virtual finite element model was created based on a clinically anatomically reduced patient. It incorporated positive and negative support derived from intramedullary and extramedullary reduction from the anteroposterior (AP) view and neutral support from the lateral view. The generated model was analyzed to understand the biomechanical behavior occurring in each region under applied physiological loads. The simulation results of this study showed that the average von Mises stress (AVMS) of the nail when performing intramedullary reduction for femoral fixation was 187% of the anatomical reduction and 171% of the extramedullary reduction, and individually up to 2.5 times higher. In other words, intramedullary reduction had a very high possibility of fixation failure compared to other reduction methods. This risk is amplified significantly, especially in situations where bone strength is compromised due to factors such as old age or osteoporosis, which substantially affects the stability of fixation. Extramedullary reduction, when appropriately positioned, demonstrates greater stability than anatomical reduction. It exhibits stable fixation even in scenarios with diminished bone strength. In instances in which the bone density was low in the support position, as observed in the lateral view, the AVMS on the nail appeared to be relatively low, particularly in cases of positive support. Additionally, the femur experienced lower equivalent stress only in the extramedullary reduction-negative position. Moreover, by comparing different reduction methods and bone stiffness values using the same femoral shape, this study offers insights into the selection of appropriate reduction methods. These insights could significantly inform decision making regarding surgical strategies for intertrochanteric fractures.

Indexed as

Finite Element AnalysisFracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaBone NailsFemurFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansMaleStress, MechanicalFinite element analysisFixation failureFracture reductionIntertrochanteric fractureProximal femoral nail

Identifiers

PMID39160241
PMCPMC11333714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.