ArticleScientific reports2024
Improving posttraumatic stress disorder assessment in young children: comparing measures and identifying clinically-relevant symptoms in children ages six and under.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological Interventions for PTSD Children and Adolescents Within Two Years of Natural Disasters: A Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of child & adolescent trauma · 2026Article
- Accuracy of the Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale - Early Screener to predict the risk for developing PTSD in young children after accidental injury.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Posttraumatic stress disorder interventions for children aged zero to six years: a scoping review.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Complex Health Needs in Hurricane-Affected Youth and Their Families: Barriers, Vulnerabilities, and Mental Health Outcomes.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young children exposed to trauma are vulnerable to developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although experts agree on the importance of tailoring PTSD assessments to be developmentally-appropriate for young children, there is little research on which assessment methods best identify clinically significant symptomatology in this difficult-to-assess population. Two competing models for assessing PTSD have been proposed by the DSM-5 and ICD-11. This study compared a DSM-5 measure to an ICD-11 measure in young children (ages 1-6) exposed to a natural disaster. The measures identified similar rates of PTSD in children; however, diagnostic agreement between the measures was low (31-36%). Both PTSD measures were associated with actual and perceived life threat, functional impairment, and comorbid psychopathology. PTSD symptom and cluster endorsement rates were also binned by age and compared to functional impairment to identify commonly-reported and highly impairing symptoms in trauma-exposed young children, as potential candidates for inclusion in future revisions of diagnostic criteria. Across age ranges, increased clinginess post-trauma was the most commonly reported symptom and was associated with functional impairment. Arousal symptoms (startle, hypervigilance) and Re-experiencing symptoms (nightmares) also emerged as relevant for young children. Findings may contribute to efforts to improve assessment for PTSD in young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.