ArticleScientific reports2024
Multi-class segmentation of temporomandibular joint using ensemble deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence models for temporomandibular joint anomalies on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Pooled it
- Deep learning for automated detection and classification of temporomandibular joint disorders: A scoping review.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Region-Specific Attention-Enhanced U-Net: Architectural Optimization for Small-Target and Weak-Boundary Segmentation in TMJ MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- 3D CSFA-UNet: a unified attention-driven deep learning framework for accurate knee MRI segmentation and osteoarthritis severity classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An attention-based transfer learning model for diagnosing subluxation in temporomandibular joint panoramic radiographs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Ultrasonographic Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporomandibular joint disorders are prevalent causes of orofacial discomfort. Diagnosis predominantly relies on assessing the configuration and positions of temporomandibular joint components in magnetic resonance images. The complex anatomy of the temporomandibular joint, coupled with the variability in magnetic resonance image quality, often hinders an accurate diagnosis. To surmount this challenge, we developed deep learning models tailored to the automatic segmentation of temporomandibular joint components, including the temporal bone, disc, and condyle. These models underwent rigorous training and validation utilizing a dataset of 3693 magnetic resonance images from 542 patients. Upon evaluation, our ensemble model, which combines five individual models, yielded average Dice similarity coefficients of 0.867, 0.733, 0.904, and 0.952 for the temporal bone, disc, condyle, and background class during internal testing. In the external validation, the average Dice similarity coefficients values for the temporal bone, disc, condyle, and background were 0.720, 0.604, 0.800, and 0.869, respectively. When applied in a clinical setting, these artificial intelligence-augmented tools enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of physicians, especially when discerning between temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement and osteoarthritis. In essence, automated temporomandibular joint segmentation by our deep learning approach, stands as a promising aid in refining temporomandibular joint disorders diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.