ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting the risk category of thymoma with machine learning-based computed tomography radiomics signatures and their between-imaging phase differences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-modal prediction model for thymic epithelial tumors: Enhancing surgical decisions and recurrence risk assessment from CT datasets.European journal of radiology open · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of thymoma risk classification with machine learning-based computed tomography radiomics features.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Thymic epithelial tumors at the crossroads of immunity, autoimmunity, and immunotherapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Review
- Contrast-enhanced CT-based habitat radiomics for distinguishing low-risk thymomas from high-risk thymomas: a multicenter study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Radiomics in thymic epithelial tumors: a scoping review of current status and advances.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Preoperative multiclass classification of thymic mass lesions based on radiomics and machine learning.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based radiomics analysis in enhancing CT for predicting pathological subtypes and WHO staging of thymic epithelial tumors: a multicenter study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors: a systematic review.Mediastinum (Hong Kong, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a medical imaging and comprehensive stacked learning-based method for predicting high- and low-risk thymoma. A total of 126 patients with thymomas and 5 patients with thymic carcinoma treated at our institution, including 65 low-risk patients and 66 high-risk patients, were retrospectively recruited. Among them, 78 patients composed the training cohort, while the remaining 53 patients formed the validation cohort. We extracted 1702 features each from the patients' arterial-, venous-, and plain-phase images. Pairwise subtraction of these features yielded 1702 arterial-venous, arterial-plain, and venous-plain difference features each. The Mann‒Whitney U test and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and SelectKBest methods were employed to select the best features from the training set. Six models were built with a stacked learning algorithm. By applying stacked ensemble learning, three machine learning algorithms (XGBoost, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest) were combined by XGBoost to produce the the six basic imaging models. Then, the XGBoost algorithm was applied to the six basic imaging models to construct a combined radiomic model. Finally, the radiomic model was combined with clinical information to create a nomogram that could easily be used in clinical practice to predict the thymoma risk category. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the combined radiomic model in the training and validation cohorts were 0.999 (95% CI 0.988-1.000) and 0.967 (95% CI 0.916-1.000), respectively, while those of the nomogram were 0.999 (95% CI 0.996-1.000) and 0.983 (95% CI 0.990-1.000). This study describes the application of CT-based radiomics in thymoma patients and proposes a nomogram for predicting the risk category for this disease, which could be advantageous for clinical decision-making for affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.