Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160112›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open quality2024

Exploring the MAPPING application to facilitate risk communication and shared decision-making between physicians and patients with gynaecological cancer.

Mijra Koning, Christianne Lok, Dirk T Ubbink, Johanna Wilhelmina Maria Aarts

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mijra KoningAmsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.
Christianne LokCentre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk T UbbinkAmsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-8879
Johanna Wilhelmina Maria AartsCentre for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands j.w.m.aarts@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0674-9405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is an observational study in which we evaluated current levels of risk communication (RC) among gynaecological oncologists and their view on the Mapping All Patient Probabilities in Numerical Graphs (MAPPING) application as a possible tool to facilitate RC and shared decision-making (SDM). In part A, we audio-recorded 29 conversations between gynaecological oncologists and patients when discussing treatment options. In part B, interviews were performed with eight gynaecological oncologists.RC and SDM were measured using two observer-based measures, that is, the RC content (RCC) tool (scale 0-2) and the OPTION-5 instrument (scale 0-100). We used CollaboRATE questionnaire (scale 0-10) and a self-developed survey to assess patient-reported RC and SDM. In part B, we evaluated physicians' attitudes regarding the use of the MAPPING application to support RC. Patients were minimally involved in the decision-making process (OPTION-5 25.9%±13.4 RCC 0.21±0.18). Patient-reported SDM was high (mean collaboRATE score 9.19±1.79) and patients preferred receiving numeric information, whereas most physicians used qualitative risk terms rather than exact numbers. In part B, gynaecologists had a positive attitude towards the MAPPING application. However, they stated that the app was difficult to use improvement of layout and better implementations are needed.

Indexed as

CommunicationDecision Making, SharedGenital Neoplasms, FemalePhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision support, clinicalObstetrics and gynecologyShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39160112
PMCPMC11337712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.