Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39160033›Full record

ArticleMedical engineering & physics2024

Geometric accuracy of low-dose CT scans for use in shoulder musculoskeletal research applications.

Rebekah L Lawrence, Lydia Nicholson, Erin C S Lee, Kelby Napier, Benjamin Zmistowski, Michael J Rainbow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rebekah L LawrenceProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, Campus Box 8502, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA. Electronic address: r.lawrence@wustl.edu.
Lydia NicholsonProgram in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, Campus Box 8502, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Erin C S LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, McLaughlin Hall, 130 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Kelby NapierMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 1 Barnes Jewish Hospital Plaza, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Benjamin ZmistowskiDepartment of Orthopedics, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8233, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Michael J RainbowDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Queen's University, McLaughlin Hall, 130 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

PURCHASE OF A SIEMENS NEXT GENERATION PET/CTS10OD025214 · OD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WOODARD, PAMELA K · 2018 to 2018
$2.0M
Investigating the Multi-factorial Etiology of Rotator Cuff Pathology in Human SubjectsR00AR075876 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LAWRENCE, REBEKAH L · 2022 to 2025
$705k
NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR075876NIH HHS S10 OD025214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) imaging is frequently employed in a variety of musculoskeletal research applications. Although research studies often use imaging protocols developed for clinical applications, lower dose protocols are likely possible when the goal is to reconstruct 3D bone models. Our purpose was to describe the dose-accuracy trade-off between incrementally lower-dose CT scans and the geometric reconstruction accuracy of the humerus, scapula, and clavicle. Six shoulder specimens were acquired and scanned using 5 helical CT protocols: 1) 120 kVp, 450 mA (full-dose); 2) 120 kVp, 120 mA; 3) 120 kVp, 100 mA; 4) 100 kVp, 100 mA; 5) 80 kVp, 80 mA. Scans were segmented and reconstructed into 3D surface meshes. Geometric error was assessed by comparing the surfaces of the low-dose meshes to the full-dose (gold standard) mesh and was described using mean absolute error, bias, precision, and worst-case error. All low-dose protocols resulted in a >70 % reduction in the effective dose. Lower dose scans resulted in higher geometric errors; however, error magnitudes were generally <0.5 mm. These data suggest that the effective dose associated with CT imaging can be substantially reduced without a significant loss of geometric reconstruction accuracy.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageShoulderTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalComputed tomography (CT)Low-doseMusculoskeletal modelingShoulder

Identifiers

PMID39160033
PMCPMC11479651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.