ArticleBJGP open2025
Identifying impaired mental health in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in general practice.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes-With a Focus on Older Populations: An AI-Assisted Rapid Review of Use and Implementation in Clinical and Organizational Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Beyond glycemic control: a holistic perspective on psychosocial support in outpatient diabetes management.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType two diabetes (T2D) is linked to impaired mental health. International guidelines emphasise the importance of including psychological aspects in diabetes care. Yet, no systematic approach has been implemented to assess mental health in patients with T2D in general practice.
aimTo evaluate the mental health of patients with T2D in general practice, and to investigate the effectiveness of asking patients about their wellbeing by using a single-item question compared with the five-item World Health Organization-Five Wellbeing Index (WHO-5). DESIGN &
settingA cross-sectional study was undertaken, which included 230 patients with T2D in Danish general practice, from 1 May 2023-31 January 2024.
methodEligible patients were recruited at the annual chronic care consultation. They answered a single-item question on wellbeing and four validated measures of general wellbeing (WHO-5), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; GAD-7), and diabetes distress (Problem Areas in Diabetes-5; PAID-5).
resultsOverall, 32% of patients expressed symptoms of impaired mental health. Notably, the WHO-5 identified 53% of these patients, whereas only 12% of patients were identified through the single-item question. Importantly, among the patients exhibiting symptoms of impaired mental health, those identified by the WHO-5 displayed statistically significantly lower mental health scores across all measures (except PAID-5) compared with those not identified by the WHO-5.
conclusionA significant proportion of patients with T2D in general practice are affected by mental health issues. Our findings indicate that a single-item question may not sufficiently detect these issues, highlighting the importance of incorporating tools, such as the WHO-5, to offer a more comprehensive approach in diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.