Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39159678›Full record

Trial reportRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2024

A phase II randomized trial of talimogene laherparepvec oncolytic immunotherapy with or without radiotherapy for patients with cutaneous metastases from solid tumors.

Christopher A Barker, Sandra P D'Angelo, Gloria Wasilewski, Alexa M Steckler, Ming Lian, Zhigang Zhang, Paul B Chapman, Alexander N Shoushtari, Charlotte E Ariyan

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher A BarkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: barkerc@mskcc.org.
Sandra P D'AngeloDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Gloria WasilewskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexa M StecklerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ming LianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Paul B ChapmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Alexander N ShoushtariDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Charlotte E AriyanDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCutaneous metastases (CMs) are a manifestation of advanced cancer and can be treated with oncolytic immunotherapy. Laboratory studies suggest radiotherapy (RT) may facilitate response to immunotherapy. We hypothesized that oncolytic immunotherapy with talimogene lapherparepvec (T-VEC, an oncolytic immunotherapy that expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor) and RT would produce response in non-targeted metastases.

methodsA randomized phase 2 trial of T-VEC+/-RT was conducted. Eligible patients had ≥1 CM from a solid tumor amenable to T-VEC and RT and another measurable metastasis. Tumor and overall response was assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. Adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL) were characterized using CTCAE v4.0 and Skindex-16, respectively. Correlative analyses of tumor genomics and the immune system were performed.

results19 patients were randomized to receive T-VEC (n = 9) or T-VEC+RT (n = 10). One patient in each arm demonstrated complete response in the largest non-targeted metastasis. The trial was closed after the first stage of enrollment because of no overall mWHO responses, slow accrual and the COVID-19 pandemic. AEs were consistent with prior reports of T-VEC. Skin related QOL was poor before and after treatment. Median progression free survival was 1.2 and 2.5 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms; median overall survival was 4.9 and 17.3 months in the T-VEC and T-VEC+RT arms. Analyses of peripheral blood cells and cytokines demonstrated responders exhibited several outlying lymphocyte and cytokine parameters.

conclusionsLow overall response rate, slow accrual, and the COVID-19 pandemic led to closure of this trial. Responses in non-injected and non-irradiated metastases were infrequent.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsOncolytic VirotherapySkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeBiological Productstalimogene laherparepvecCutaneous metastasesCutaneous metastasisImmunotherapyOncolytic immunotherapyRadiation therapyRadiotherapyTalimogene laherparepvecT-VECTVECViral immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39159678
PMCPMC11438562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.