ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
Improving neurological deficits secondary to transverse myelitis using epidural spinal cord stimulation: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spinal cord neuromodulation for autonomic recovery following spinal cord injury: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidural spinal cord stimulation (eSCS) is canonically used for the treatment of intractable, chronic pain. Recent efforts have successfully utilized eSCS to improve neurological deficits in patients with spinal cord injury. However, there is a paucity of literature on the use of eSCS for demyelinating conditions, with no prior case reports examining eSCS among patients with transverse myelitis (TM). OBSERVATIONS: Two patients with TM underwent eSCS and experienced improvements in motor function and bladder symptoms. The first patient exhibited enhanced motor strength in both lower extremities and no longer experienced leg spasms, increasing exercise capacity and decreasing their fall risk. The patient had reduced incontinence pad usage due to a regained ability to sense bladder fullness. The second patient also experienced improved motor scores, leading to enhanced motor functionality and independence. Furthermore, the patient observed reductions in urinary tract infections post-eSCS. Neither patient reported substantial improvement in bowel function following stimulation. LESSONS: Improvements in motor functionality and bladder functioning are well-documented as factors that improve quality of life among paraplegic patients. Given the findings of the present case report, larger cohort studies examining the use of eSCS for demyelinating conditions, including TM, are warranted. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24152.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.