Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39159459›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of internal medicine2024

Effect of Starting Dialysis Versus Continuing Medical Management on Survival and Home Time in Older Adults With Kidney Failure : A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Maria E Montez-Rath, I-Chun Thomas, Vivek Charu, Michelle C Odden, Carolyn D Seib, Shipra Arya, Enrica Fung, Ann M O'Hare, Susan P Y Wong, Manjula Kurella Tamura

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ASN Kidney Health Guidance on Conservative Management in People with Kidney Failure.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria E Montez-RathDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California (M.E.M., E.F.).ORCID 0000-0001-5154-2182
I-Chun ThomasGeriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California (I.-C.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-5686-3022
Vivek CharuQuantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California (V.C.).
Michelle C OddenDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, and Geriatric, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California (M.C.O.).ORCID 0000-0002-5974-3648
Carolyn D SeibDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Division of General Surgery, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (C.D.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-2438-9658
Shipra AryaDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Division of Vascular Surgery, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California (S.A.).ORCID 0000-0002-0404-9325
Enrica FungDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California (M.E.M., E.F.).
Ann M O'HareDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service and Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (A.M.O., S.P.Y.W.).
Susan P Y WongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, and Hospital and Specialty Medicine Service and Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington (A.M.O., S.P.Y.W.).
Manjula Kurella TamuraDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, and Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto, Palo Alto, California (M.K.T.).ORCID 0000-0001-5227-2479

Funding

A Mentoring Program in Kidney Care for Older AdultsK24AG073615 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MANJULA KURELLA TAMURA · 2022 to 2026
$651k
HSRD VA I01 HX002763HSRD VA I01 HX003215NIA NIH HHS K24 AG073615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor older adults with kidney failure who are not referred for transplant, medical management is an alternative to dialysis.

objectiveTo compare survival and home time between older adults who started dialysis at an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 12 mL/min/1.73 m

designObservational cohort study using target trial emulation.

settingU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2010 to 2018.

participantsAdults aged 65 years or older with chronic kidney failure and eGFR below 12 mL/min/1.73 m

interventionStarting dialysis within 30 days versus continuing medical management. MEASUREMENTS: Mean survival and number of days at home.

resultsAmong 20 440 adults (mean age, 77.9 years [SD, 8.8]), the median time to dialysis start was 8.0 days in the group starting dialysis and 3.0 years in the group continuing medical management. Over a 3-year horizon, the group starting dialysis survived 770 days and the group continuing medical management survived 761 days (difference, 9.3 days [95% CI, -17.4 to 30.1 days]). Compared with the group continuing medical management, the group starting dialysis had 13.6 fewer days at home (CI, 7.7 to 20.5 fewer days at home). Compared with the group continuing medical management and forgoing dialysis completely, the group starting dialysis had longer survival by 77.6 days (CI, 62.8 to 91.1 days) and 14.7 fewer days at home (CI, 11.2 to 16.5 fewer days at home). LIMITATION: Potential for unmeasured confounding due to lack of symptom assessments at eligibility; limited generalizability to women and nonveterans.

conclusionOlder adults starting dialysis when their eGFR fell below 12 mL/min/1.73 m PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateKidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39159459
PMCPMC11995948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.