Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39159451›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Co-Designing a Smoking Cessation Chatbot: Focus Group Study of End Users and Smoking Cessation Professionals.

Hollie Bendotti, Sheleigh Lawler, David Ireland, Coral Gartner, Henry M Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hollie BendottiThoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-4809
Sheleigh LawlerSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-0551
David IrelandAustralia e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2189-4624
Coral GartnerSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-8035
Henry M MarshallThoracic Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-8014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur prototype smoking cessation chatbot, Quin, provides evidence-based, personalized support delivered via a smartphone app to help people quit smoking. We developed Quin using a multiphase program of co-design research, part of which included focus group evaluation of Quin among stakeholders prior to clinical testing.

objectiveThis study aimed to gather and compare feedback on the user experience of the Quin prototype from end users and smoking cessation professionals (SCPs) via a beta testing process to inform ongoing chatbot iterations and refinements.

methodsFollowing active and passive recruitment, we conducted web-based focus groups with SCPs and end users from Queensland, Australia. Participants tested the app for 1-2 weeks prior to focus group discussion and could also log conversation feedback within the app. Focus groups of SCPs were completed first to review the breadth and accuracy of information, and feedback was prioritized and implemented as major updates using Agile processes prior to end user focus groups. We categorized logged in-app feedback using content analysis and thematically analyzed focus group transcripts.

resultsIn total, 6 focus groups were completed between August 2022 and June 2023; 3 for SCPs (n=9 participants) and 3 for end users (n=7 participants). Four SCPs had previously smoked, and most end users currently smoked cigarettes (n=5), and 2 had quit smoking. The mean duration of focus groups was 58 (SD 10.9; range 46-74) minutes. We identified four major themes from focus group feedback: (1) conversation design, (2) functionality, (3) relationality and anthropomorphism, and (4) role as a smoking cessation support tool. In response to SCPs' feedback, we made two major updates to Quin between cohorts: (1) improvements to conversation flow and (2) addition of the "Moments of Crisis" conversation tree. Participant feedback also informed 17 recommendations for future smoking cessation chatbot developments.

conclusionsFeedback from end users and SCPs highlighted the importance of chatbot functionality, as this underpinned Quin's conversation design and relationality. The ready accessibility of accurate cessation information and impartial support that Quin provided was recognized as a key benefit for end users, the latter of which contributed to a feeling of accountability to the chatbot. Findings will inform the ongoing development of a mature prototype for clinical testing.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsSmoking CessationAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsQueenslandappsartificial intelligencebehavior changechatbotdigital interventionsmobile healthmobile phonesmartphonesmokingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID39159451
PMCPMC11369547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.