ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2024
Comparative biophysical study of clinical surfactants using constrained drop surfactometry.
Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Controlled-Area Droplet Evaporimeter Reveals Surface Pressure-Dependent Evaporation Resistance of the Tear Film Lipid Layer.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- How sighing regulates pulmonary surfactant structure and its role in breathing mechanics.Science advances · 2025Article
- A Linear-Regression-Based Method for Determining Surface Tension from Variation in Interfacial Curvature.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Surfactant replacement therapy is crucial in managing neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Currently licensed clinical surfactants in the United States and Europe, including Survanta, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Alveofact, are all derived from bovine or porcine sources. We conducted a comprehensive examination of the biophysical properties of these four clinical surfactant preparations under physiologically relevant conditions, using constrained drop surfactometry (CDS). The assessed biophysical properties included the adsorption rate, quasi-static and dynamic surface activity, resistance to surfactant inhibition by meconium, and the morphology of the adsorbed surfactant films. This comparative study unveiled distinct in vitro biophysical properties of these clinical surfactants and revealed correlations between their chemical composition, lateral film structure, and biophysical functionality. Notably, at 1 mg/mL, Survanta exhibited a significantly lower adsorption rate compared with the other preparations at the same surfactant concentration. At 10 mg/mL, Infasurf, Curosurf, and Survanta all demonstrated excellent dynamic surface activity, whereas Alveofact exhibited the poorest quasi-static and dynamic surface activity. The suboptimal surface activity of Alveofact is found to be correlated with its unique monolayer-predominant morphology, in contrast to other surfactants forming multilayers. Curosurf, in particular, showcased superior resistance to biophysical inhibition by meconium compared with other preparations. Understanding the diverse biophysical behaviors of clinical surfactants provides crucial insights for precision and personalized design in treating RDS and other respiratory conditions. The findings from this study contribute valuable perspectives for the development of more efficacious and fully synthetic surfactant preparations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.