Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39159192›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Towards attainment of the 2030 goal for childhood cancer survival for the World Health Organization Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer: An ecological, cross-sectional study.

Emily R Smith, Cesia Cotache-Condor, Harold Leraas, Paul Truche, Zachary J Ward, Cristina Stefan, Lisa Force, Nickhill Bhakta, Henry E Rice

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiotoxicity among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Comparative and Integrated View of Multiple Measures of Biological Age Acceleration.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily R SmithDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1745-5728
Cesia Cotache-CondorDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Harold LeraasDepartment of Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-1218
Paul TrucheDepartment of Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Zachary J WardCenter for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4007-2207
Cristina StefanSinghealth Duke-National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5740-1209
Lisa ForceDepartment of Health Metrics Sciences and Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nickhill BhaktaDepartment of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Henry E RiceDuke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-6687

Funding

Improving access to cancer care for children in Tanzania: Designing a health-systems interventionK01TW012181 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Emily Smith · 2022 to 2026
$816k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW012181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently launched the Global Initiative for Childhood Cancer (GICC), with the goal of attaining at least 60% cancer survival for children worldwide by the year 2030. This study aims to describe the global patterns of childhood cancer survival in 2019 to help guide progress in attaining the GICC target goal. In this ecological, cross-sectional study, we used 5-year net childhood cancer survival (2015-2019) data from a prior micro-modeling study from 197 countries and territories. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the patterns of overall childhood cancer survival and survival for each of the six cancer tracer diagnoses as proposed by the GICC. We used hot spot analysis to identify geographic clusters of high and low cancer survival. Most high-income countries reached at least 60% (92%, n = 59/64), net childhood cancer survival at baseline. No lower-middle-income or low-income country reached at least 60% overall cancer survival at baseline. The South-East Asia region had the highest proportion of countries that did not achieve at least 60% survival at baseline (100%, n = 10/10), followed by the African region (98%, n = 49/50). For each cancer tracer diagnosis, we found the highest number of countries that have achieved at least 60% survival was for Burkitt lymphoma (44%, n = 87/197) followed by acute lymphocytic leukemia (41%, n = 80/197).Hot spot analysis showed the highest overall survival was concentrated in North America and Europe, while the lowest survival was concentrated in Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia.A majority of LMICs had not reached the WHO target goal of at least 60% survival from childhood cancer at baseline in 2019, with variable success for the six childhood cancer tracer diagnoses of the GICC. These findings provide baseline assessment of individual country performance to help achieve the GICC goal of 60% overall cancer survival globally by 2030.

Identifiers

PMID39159192
PMCPMC11332931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.