Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39159155›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

What's the harm? Results of an active surveillance adverse event reporting system for chiropractors and physiotherapists.

Katherine A Pohlman, Martha Funabashi, Maeve O'Beirne, J David Cassidy, Michael D Hill, Eric L Hurwitz, Gregory Kawchuk, Silvano Mior, Quazi Ibrahim, Haymo Thiel and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Adverse events following cervical spine self-manipulation: A systematic review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katherine A PohlmanResearch Center, Parker University, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1536-112X
Martha FunabashiDivision of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maeve O'BeirneFamily Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J David CassidyDivision of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael D HillDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Eric L HurwitzOffice of Public Health Studies, Thompson School of Social Work & Public Health, University of Hawaii at Mānoa Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.
Gregory KawchukDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Silvano MiorDivision of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quazi IbrahimDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University (Hamilton, Ontario, Canada).
Haymo ThielHealth Sciences University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Michael WestawayDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jerome YagerDepartment of Paediatrics, Pediatric Neurosciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sunita VohraDepartment of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6210-7933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective, community-based, active surveillance study aimed to report the incidence of moderate, severe, and serious adverse events (AEs) after chiropractic (n = 100) / physiotherapist (n = 50) visit in offices throughout North America between October-2015 and December-2017. Three content-validated questionnaires were used to collect AE information: two completed by the patient (pre-treatment [T0] and 2-7 days post-treatment [T2]) and one completed by the provider immediately post-treatment [T1]. Any new or worsened symptom was considered an AE and further classified as mild, moderate, severe or serious. From the 42 participating providers (31 chiropractors; 11 physiotherapists), 3819 patient visits had complete T0 and T1 assessments. The patients were on average 50±18 years of age and 62.5% females. Neck/back pain was the most common presenting condition (70.0%) with 24.3% of patients reporting no condition/preventative care. From the patients visits with a complete T2 assessment (n = 2136 patient visits, 55.9%), 21.3% reported an AE, of which: 7.9% were mild, 6.2% moderate, 3.7% severe, 1.5% serious, and 2.0% had missing severity rating. The most common symptoms reported with moderate or higher severity were discomfort/pain, stiffness, difficulty walking and headache. This study provides valuable information for patients and providers regarding incidence and severity of AEs following patient visits in multiple community-based professions. These findings can be used to inform patients of what AEs may occur and future research opportunities can focus on mitigating common AEs.

Indexed as

ChiropracticPhysical TherapistsAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39159155
PMCPMC11332930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.