ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Impact of climate change on maternal health outcomes: An evidence gap map review.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aspirin and Preterm Birth Among Pregnant People With Increased Heat Exposure: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Strengthening Rural Primary Healthcare for Climate Resilience in Zambia: An Equity-Centered Approach.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Mapping research priorities related to maternal and infant nutritional health in the context of climate change in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Impact of extreme precipitation events on facility-based births in 21 sub-Saharan African countries.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Heat, health and inequalities in the WHO European region - a scoping review with an intersectional lens.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Perinatal Health Care Among Climate Migrant Women: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Mixed-method study on the perception of residents of rural flood-prone community towards the impacts of climate change and variability on health and wellbeing: Chiniot, Pakistan.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Ambient temperature, rainfall, and adverse maternal and child health outcomes in Nigeria: evidence from a national cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- The Effect of Climate Change on Menstrual Health: A Qualitative Study of Gabura Union, Shyamnagar, Satkhira, Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Challenges with developing nutritional recommendations to improve pregnancy outcomes.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Nonlinear association between wet-bulb globe temperature and maternal hypertensive disorders burden: a global analysis from 1990 to 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The health impact of climate change on the women in reproductive age: a study of coastal communities in Satkhira, Bangladesh.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Facing the future: The nexus between climate change and women's health.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Climate change and children's health: resilience challenges for Brazil.Jornal de pediatriaReview
- "When the climate changes, we feel it first": Gendered perceptions of environmental change and women's health in Pakistan.Women's health (London, England)Article
- Climate education as adaptation: A scoping review of programs advancing maternal and newborn health.The journal of climate change and healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change poses unique challenges to maternal well-being and increases complications during pregnancy and childbirth globally. This evidence gap map (EGM) aims to identify gaps in existing knowledge and areas where further research related to climate change and its impact on maternal health is required. The following databases were searched individually from inception to present: Medline, EMBASE, and Global Health via OVID; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCOhost; Scopus; and organizational websites. In this EGM, we integrated 133 studies published in English, including qualitative, quantitative, reviews and grey literature that examined the impact of climate change on maternal health (women aged 15-45). We used Covidence to screen studies and Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (Eppi reviewer)/Eppi Mapper software to generate the EGM. Data extraction and qualitative appraisal of the studies was done using critical appraisal tools. The study protocol was registered in International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY) # INPLASY202370085. Out of 133 included studies, forty seven studies were of high quality, seventy nine moderate equality and seven low quality. This EGM found notable gaps in the literature regarding the distribution of research across regions. We found significant research in North America (51) and Asia (40 studies). However, Africa and the Caribbean had fewer studies, highlighting potential disparities in research attention and resources. Moreover, while the impact of extreme heat emerged as a prominent factor impacting maternal well-being, there is a need for further investigation into other climate-related factors such as drought. Additionally, while preterm stillbirth and maternal mortality have gained attention, there is an overlook of malnutrition and food insecurity indicators that require attention in future research. The EGM identifies existing research gaps in climate change and maternal health. It emphasizes the need for global collaboration and targeted interventions to address disparities and inform climate-responsive policies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.