Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158915›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Cognition and Return to Work Status 2 Years After Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Marie Lange, Justine Lequesne, Agnes Dumas, Bénédicte Clin, Ines Vaz-Luis, Barbara Pistilli, Olivier Rigal, Christelle Lévy, Florence Lerebours, Anne-Laure Martin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Methodology of analysis of cognitive impairment in longitudinal randomized clinical trials in oncology: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Work challenges and cancer-related cognitive impairment: level of education accounts for unmet needs beyond cognitive impairment severity.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The MASCC COG-IMPACT: An unmet needs assessment for cancer-related cognitive impairment impact developed by the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marie LangeANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Justine LequesneANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Agnes DumasAix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM (Economic and Social Sciences of Health and Medical Information Processing), Marseille, France.
Bénédicte ClinANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.
Ines Vaz-LuisINSERM, Gustave Roussy Institute, University Paris Saclay, Unit Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Villejuif, France.
Barbara PistilliMedical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Olivier RigalCare Support Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.
Christelle LévyInstitut Normand du Sein, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Florence LereboursMedical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France.
Anne-Laure MartinUNICANCER, Paris, France.
Sibille EverhardUNICANCER, Paris, France.
Gwenn MenvielleINSERM, Gustave Roussy Institute, University Paris Saclay, Unit Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Villejuif, France.
Florence JolyANTICIPE U1086 INSERM-UCN, Equipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Centre François Baclesse, Normandie Université UNICAEN, Caen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Return to work after breast cancer (BC) treatment depends on several factors, including treatment-related adverse effects. While cancer-related cognitive impairment is frequently reported by patients with BC, to date, no longitudinal studies have assessed its association with return to work. Objective: To examine whether cognition, assessed using objective and subjective scores, was associated with return to work 2 years after BC diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a case series of the French Cancer Toxicities (CANTO) cohort, a study of patients with stage I to III BC investigated cognition from April 2014 to December 2018 (2 years' follow-up). Participants included women aged 58 years or younger at BC diagnosis who were employed or looking for a job. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was return to work assessed 2 years after BC diagnosis. Objective cognitive functioning (tests), cognitive symptoms, anxiety, depression, and fatigue were prospectively assessed at diagnosis (baseline), 1 year after treatment completion, and 2 years after diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to explain return to work status at year 2 according to each cognitive measure separately, adjusted for age, occupational class, stage at diagnosis, and chemotherapy. Results: The final sample included 178 women with BC (median age: 48.7 [range, 28-58] years), including 37 (20.8%) who did not return to work at year 2. Patients who returned to work had a higher (ie, professional) occupational class and were less likely to have had a mastectomy (24.1% vs 54.1%; P < .001). Return to work at year 2 was associated with lower overall cognitive impairment (1-point unit of increased odds ratio [1-pt OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P = .01), higher working memory (1-pt OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.59; P = .008), higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.20-3.36; P = .01) and higher attention performance (1-pt OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.64; P = .04), higher perceived cognitive abilities (1-pt OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21; P = .007), and lower depression (1-pt OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P = .001) at year 2 assessment. Return to work at year 2 was associated with several measures assessed at baseline and year 1: higher processing speed (1-pt OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.37-4.31; P = .003 and 1.95; 95% CI, 1.14-3.50; P = .02), higher executive performance (1-pt OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.28-5.75; P = .01, and 2.88; 95% CI, 1.36-6.28; P = .006), and lower physical fatigue (10-pt OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .009 and 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.98; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this case series study of patients with BC, return to work 2 years after diagnosis was associated with higher cognitive speed performance before and after BC treatment. Cognitive difficulties should be assessed before return to work to propose suitable management.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCognitionReturn to WorkAdultCognitive DysfunctionDepressionFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39158915
PMCPMC11333979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.