Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158818›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2024

The HOPE cohort: cohort profile and evaluation of selection bias.

Mette-Marie Zacher Kjeldsen, Merete Lund Mægbæk, Xiaoqin Liu, Malene Galle Madsen, Mette Bliddal, Sofie Egsgaard, Kathrine Bang Madsen, Trine Munk-Olsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mette-Marie Zacher KjeldsenNCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Mmzk.ncrr@au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-3427
Merete Lund MægbækNCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Xiaoqin LiuNCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Malene Galle MadsenNCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Mette BliddalResearch Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Sofie EgsgaardDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kathrine Bang Madsen *NCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Trine Munk-Olsen *NCRR-National Centre for Register-Based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HOPE cohort is a Danish nationwide cohort with ongoing follow-up, holding information on postpartum depression (PPD) symptoms and diagnoses on 170,218 childbirths (142,795 unique mothers). These data have been linked with extensive register data on health and socioeconomic information on the mothers, their partners, parents, and children. This cohort profile aimed to provide an overview of the data collection and content, describe characteristics, and evaluate potential selection bias. PPD screenings, using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, were collected from 67 of the 98 Danish municipalities, covering the period January 2015 to December 2021. This data was linked with register data on PPD diagnoses (identified through medication prescriptions and hospital contacts) as well as background information. Cohort characteristics were compared to the source population, defined as all childbirths by women residing in Denmark during the same period (452,207 childbirths). Potential selection bias was evaluated by comparing odds ratios of five well-established associations between the cohort and the source population. The HOPE cohort holds information on 170,218 childbirths (38% of the source population) involving 142,795 unique mothers. The HOPE cohort only differed slightly from the source population on most characteristics examined, but larger differences were observed on specific characteristics with an underrepresentation of the youngest and oldest age groups, women with more than three children or twins/triplets, and women born outside Denmark. Similar associations were identified across the two populations within the five well-established associations. There was no indication of selection bias on the five examined associations, and the HOPE cohort is representative of the source population on important perinatal characteristics.

Indexed as

Depression, PostpartumMothersAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansPregnancyRegistriesSelection BiasSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultCohort profileEdinburgh postnatal depression scalePostpartum depressionSelection

Identifiers

PMID39158818
PMCPMC11410971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.