ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2024
Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of OATP1B Substrates with a Nonlinear Mixed Effect Approach: Estimating Empirical In Vitro-to-In Vivo Scaling Factors.
Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodistribution of Cerivastatin, Repaglinide, Glyburide, Rosuvastatin, and Valsartan in Cynomolgus Monkeys and PBPK Analysis.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Organic anion transporting polypeptides: Pharmacology, toxicology, structure, and transport mechanisms.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePhysiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are valuable for translating in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data to predict clinical pharmacokinetics, and can enable discovery and early clinical stages of pharmaceutical research. However, in predicting pharmacokinetics of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B substrates based on in vitro transport and metabolism data, PBPK models typically require additional empirical in vitro-to-in vivo scaling factors (ESFs) in order to accurately recapitulate observed clinical profiles. As model simulation is very sensitive to ESFs, a critical evaluation of ESF estimation is prudent. Previously studies have applied classic 'two-stage' and 'naïve pooled data' approaches in identifying a set of compound independent ESFs. However, the 'two-stage' approach has the parameter identification issue in separately fitting data for individual compounds, while the 'naïve pooled data' approach ignores interstudy variability, leading to potentially biased ESF estimates.
methodsIn this study, we have applied a nonlinear mixed-effect approach in estimating ESF of the PBPK model and incorporated additional data from 86 runs of in vitro uptake assay and 49 clinical studies of 12 training compounds in model development to further enhance the translation of in vitro data to predict the pharmacokinetics of OATP1B substrate drugs. To test predication accuracy of the model, a 'leave-one-out' analysis has been performed.
resultsThe established model can reasonably describe the clinical observations, with both mean values and interstudy variabilities quantified for ESF and volume of distribution parameters. The mean estimates are largely consistent with values in the previous reports. The interstudy variabilities of these parameters are estimated to be at least 50% (as coefficient of variation). Most compounds can be reasonably predicted in the 'leave-one-out' analysis.
conclusionThis study improves the confidence in predicting the pharmacokinetics of OATP1B substrates in individual studies of small sample sizes, and quantifies the variability associated with the prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39158814What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.