ArticleHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2024
[Holter monitoring].
Article in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seven-day ECG Holter vs. 14-day event Holter in the detection of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, new atrial fibrillation, and silent ischemia among heart failure patients from social exclusion regions.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- The λ pattern on time-RR interval scatter plot of neonatal ambulatory ECG: a marker of transient bradycardia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Holter monitoring represents a valuable diagnostic tool to document intermittent arrhythmias in the work-up of, for example, syncope, presyncope, collapse, falls, dizziness, stroke, palpitations, and a rapid heartbeat. In addition, it may help in the diagnosis of intermittent ischemia and channelopathies, particularly in the form of 12-lead Holter monitoring. Continuous ECG registration typically lasts from 24-48 h. The use of Holter monitoring is limited in patients with rare symptoms (< 1 × per month) and in recordings full of artifacts. The interpretation of a Holter recording combines an automatic analysis with a manual reassessment. The clinical relevance of many arrhythmias can only be considered together with symptoms and activity of the patient at the time of the event. Therefore, a patient diary accompanying the ECG recording is crucial. Systematic assessment of the ECG recording and knowledge about a number of pitfalls in Holter monitoring can optimize the interpretation of the recording.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39158752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.