Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158749›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2024

Addressing dermatologic concerns and teledermatology in undomiciled and sheltered populations.

Kennedy Gallagher, Sahithi Talasila, Anna Bistline, Rebecca Krain, Leena Ramani, Elizabeth Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kennedy Gallagher *Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Sahithi Talasila *Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Anna BistlineDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Rebecca KrainDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Leena RamaniDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Elizabeth JonesDepartment of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, 233 S. 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. Elizabeth.Jones@jefferson.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homelessness in the United States is a significant public health issue, with dermatologic disease being the most prevalent health concern among the undomiciled and sheltered populations. Despite a growing need for dermatologic care, the supply of dermatologists remains insufficient, contributing to disparities in healthcare access for this vulnerable group. This review aims to detail the spectrum of dermatologic conditions experienced by homeless individuals, identify barriers to adequate care, and explore teledermatology as a potential solution to bridge these gaps. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing studies and reports on dermatologic issues prevalent among the homeless population and the efficacy of teledermatology in addressing these concerns. Homeless individuals face a wide range of dermatologic problems, from common conditions like acne and eczema to severe issues such as cellulitis, leg ulcers, and skin cancer. Drug abuse, domestic and sexual abuse, and parasitic infestations further complicate the dermatologic health of this population. Teledermatology has emerged as a promising tool to enhance access to dermatologic care, showing significant improvements in clinical outcomes and accessibility, especially in underserved urban settings. However, challenges remain, such as the digital divide affecting the elderly and low-income populations, which could potentially exacerbate disparities. Addressing the dermatologic needs of the homeless population requires a multifaceted approach. Teledermatology offers a viable solution to improve care access and efficiency, but additional efforts are necessary to ensure inclusivity and avoid further marginalization. Volunteer-driven multidisciplinary clinics also play a crucial role in providing care, though they face challenges in continuity and resource availability. Future strategies should focus on integrating teledermatology with other supportive services to create a comprehensive care model for this underserved population.

Indexed as

DermatologyHealth Services AccessibilityIll-Housed PersonsSkin DiseasesTelemedicineHealthcare DisparitiesHumansUnited StatesAccess to careDermatologic diseaseHealthcare disparitiesHomelessnessTeledermatologyUndomiciled populations

Identifiers

PMID39158749
PMCPMC11333556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.