ReviewNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2025
Daidzein's potential in halting neurodegeneration: unveiling mechanistic insights.
Review in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chasing the FoxO in Metabolic Disorders: Novel Considerations for Oxidative Stress, Programmed Cell Death, Wnt, and the Gut Microbiome.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Potential of Dietary Agent Daidzein in Cancer Prevention and Treatment: Opportunities and Challenges.Cancers · 2026Review
- Biological activities and therapeutic potential of soy isoflavones: a focus on anticancer activity.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Running out the clock: Circadian rhythm dysfunction in cognitive disease.International review of neurobiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Neurotherapeutics across blood-brain barrier: screening of BBB-permeable and CNS-active molecules for neurodegenerative disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological conditions encompassing a wide range of disorders pose significant challenges globally. The complex interactions among signaling pathways and molecular elements play pivotal roles in the initiation and progression of neurodegenerative diseases. Isoflavones have emerged as a promising candidate to fight against neurodegenerative diseases. Daidzein, a 7-hydroxy-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-chromen-4-one, belongs to the isoflavone class and exhibits a diverse pharmacological profile. It is found primarily in soybeans and soy products, as well as in some other legumes and herbs. Investigations into daidzein have revealed that it confers neuroprotection by inhibiting oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis, which are key contributors to neuronal damage and degeneration. Activating pathways like PI3K/Akt/mTOR and promoting neurotrophic factors like BDNF by daidzein underscore its potential in supporting neuronal function and combating neurodegeneration. Daidzein's effects on dopamine provide further avenues for intervention in conditions like Parkinson's disease. Additionally, the modulation of inflammatory and NRF-2-antioxidant signaling by daidzein reinforces its neuroprotective role. Moreover, daidzein's interaction with receptors and cellular processes like ER-β, GPR30, MAO, VEGF, and GnRH highlights its multifaceted effects across multiple pathways involved in neuroprotection and neuronal function. This review article delves into the mechanistic interplay of various mediators in mediating the neuroprotective effects of daidzein. The review article consolidates and analyzes research published over nearly two decades (2005-2024) from various databases, including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, to provide a comprehensive understanding of daidzein's effects and mechanisms in neuroprotection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39158734What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.