Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158727›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Red flags for child abuse : Pediatric radiological and forensic aspects].

Maria L Hahnemann, Daniel Wittschieber, Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria L HahnemannKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie und Kinderneuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Daniel WittschieberInstitut für Rechtsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Stiftsplatz 12, 53111, Bonn, Deutschland. daniel.wittschieber@ukbonn.de.
Hans-Joachim MentzelSektion Kinderradiologie, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueThe diagnostics of physical child abuse are usually performed by a multidisciplinary team and frequently represent a clinical challenge. Radiological expertise is particularly important for the recognition of abusive injuries to the skeletal system and the central nervous system. The aim of the article is to give an overview of red flags of child abuse in radiological imaging. IMAGING

methodsFor the diagnostics of child abuse, conventional projection radiography of the skeletal system as well as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head are especially relevant. There is insufficient evidence with respect to sonography.

conclusionRadiological imaging plays a key role for recognizing physical child abuse. Radiological red flags of child abuse can be crucial for making the diagnosis.

Indexed as

Child AbuseForensic MedicineFractures, BoneHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedClassical metaphyseal lesionsHealing stages of fracturesPhysical child abusePosterior and lateral rib fracturesSubdural fluid collection

Identifiers

PMID39158727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.