Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158711›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2025

Exploring the impact of maternal early life adversity on interoceptive sensibility in pregnancy: implications for prenatal depression.

Paul W Savoca, Laura M Glynn, Molly M Fox, Misty C Richards, Bridget L Callaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Call to Integrate Measures of Environmental Context into Research on Maternal Brain Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  2. Interoception in pregnancy: Implications for peripartum depression.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul W SavocaDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Psychology Building 1285, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. ps365@g.ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6954-8336
Laura M GlynnDepartment of Psychology, Chapman University, Orange, USA.
Molly M FoxDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Misty C RichardsDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Bridget L CallaghanDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Psychology Building 1285, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

Funding

Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD041022 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Martha Jane Bailey · 2016 to 2026
$6.9M
Graduate Education at UCLA Graduate Education at UCLANICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041022University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Society of Hellman Fellows Program University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Society of Hellman Fellows Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePregnancy is a sensitive period of development in adult life characterized by massive changes in physical, emotional, and cognitive function. Such changes may be adaptive, e.g., facilitating adjustment to physical demands, but they may also reflect or contribute to risks inherent to this stage of life, e.g., prenatal depression. One cognitive ability that may undergo change during pregnancy and contribute to mental wellness is interoception - the ability to perceive, integrate, and model sensory information originating from the body. Strong interoceptive abilities are associated with lower rates of depression in non-pregnant adult populations, and interoception is generally weaker in individuals at higher risk for depression, for example, exposure to early life adversity (ELA). In the present online, cross-sectional study, we investigated whether interoception in pregnant women differed based on histories of ELA, in ways that increased their relative risk for prenatal depression symptoms.

methodsThe pregnant individuals were in the second trimester of their first pregnancy and were compared to a group of nulliparous, non-parenting women.

resultsPrevious exposure to ELA significantly moderated pregnancy-related differences in self-reported interoception (interoceptive sensibility). A further moderated-mediation analysis revealed that the extent to which interoceptive sensibility buffered against depressive symptoms was conditional on ELA exposure, suggesting more ELA is associated with lower interoceptive sensibility during pregnancy, which increased prenatal depression risk.

conclusionsTogether this work suggests that levels of interoception during pregnancy are sensitive to previous adversity exposure. It also suggests that interoceptive-focused interventions for preventing/treating prenatal depressive symptoms in high-risk women may be worth exploring.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesDepressionInteroceptionPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalYoung AdultDepressionEarly-life adversityInteroceptionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39158711
PMCPMC11761834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.