Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158706›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2024

"It's all about setting the stage." The nurse facilitator trial: perceived outcomes and implementation issues. A qualitative study among ICU clinicians and nurse facilitators.

Anne Renet, Elie Azoulay, Jean Reignier, Alain Cariou, Anne Renault, Olivier Huet, Frédéric Pochard, Ruth A Engelberg, Nancy Kentish-Barnes

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne RenetAPHP Nord, Saint Louis Hospital, Famiréa Research Group, Intensive Care Unit, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France.
Elie AzoulayAPHP Nord, Saint Louis Hospital, Famiréa Research Group, Intensive Care Unit, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France.
Jean ReignierMedical Intensive Care Unit, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.
Alain CariouParis Cité University, Paris, France.
Anne RenaultMedical Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Olivier HuetAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France.
Frédéric PochardAPHP Nord, Saint Louis Hospital, Famiréa Research Group, Intensive Care Unit, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France.
Ruth A EngelbergCambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence at UW Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nancy Kentish-BarnesAPHP Nord, Saint Louis Hospital, Famiréa Research Group, Intensive Care Unit, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, France. nancy.kentish@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-0024-0429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor the first time in France, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of a nurse facilitator on family psychological symptoms. We sought to explore the implementation of the intervention, how it was experienced by clinicians, as well as the barriers and facilitators to implementing the change.

methodsWe conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians and facilitators involved in the trial. Interview questions focused on participants' perceptions of the intervention and its outcomes, including the effect of the intervention on patients, families and the health care team, and barriers and facilitators to its implementation. Interviews were conducted by two social science researchers, audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

resultsTwenty-three clinicians were interviewed from the five participating ICUs. Three themes emerged, capturing clinicians' perspectives on implementing the intervention: (1) improved communication and enhanced care for families and the ICU team, albeit with some associated risks; (2) active listening and support, both for families and ICU clinicians but with certain limitations; (3) barriers to implementation including lack of organizational readiness, exclusion of under-represented groups, and facilitator challenges including role ambiguity and the need for role support.

conclusionParticipants believed the facilitator intervention potentially improved families' experience. However, they also highlighted emotional difficulties and tensions with some members of the participating teams, due to competing territories and ambiguous role definitions. Facilitators' failure to affect decision-making suggests their role in enhancing goal-concordant care was inadequate within the setting.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationFemaleFranceHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedCommunication facilitatorIntervention implementationQualitative research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.