Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158704›Full record

Observational studyIntensive care medicine2024

The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

Luke Flower, Alicia Waite, Adam Boulton, Marcus Peck, Waqas Akhtar, Andrew J Boyle, Sandeep Gudibande, Thomas E Ingram, Brian Johnston, Sarah Marsh and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Luke FlowerVictor Phillip Dahdaleh Heart and Lung Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. luke.flower@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7204-609X
Alicia WaiteNorth West Deanery School of Intensive Care Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Adam BoultonWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Marcus PeckDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Winchester, UK.
Waqas AkhtarDepartment of Critical Care, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Andrew J BoyleWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Sandeep GudibandeDepartment of Critical Care, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Thomas E IngramDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Brian JohnstonUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah MarshDepartment of Critical Care, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, Harrogate, UK.
Ashley MillerDepartment of Critical Care, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospitals NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK.
Amy NashNHS England Wessex School of Anaesthesia, Wessex, UK.
Olusegun OlusanyaDepartment of Critical Care, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Prashant ParulekarDepartment of Critical Care, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, UK.
Daniel WagstaffWessex School of Intensive Care Medicine, NHS England, Wessex, UK.
Jonathan WilkinsonDepartment of Critical Care, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, UK.
Alastair G ProudfootDepartment of Critical Care, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
NEAT ECHO Collaborators

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/W03011X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEchocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines.

methodsWe conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making.

results1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance.

conclusionUse of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock.

Indexed as

Critical CareEchocardiographyShockAdultAgedFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUnited KingdomCritical careEchocardiographyIntensive careShockUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.