Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158676›Full record

ReviewEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2024

Outcome research on esophagectomy analyzed using nationwide databases in Japan: evidences generated from real-world data.

Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Masayuki Watanabe, Koji Kono, Hideki Ueno, Yuichiro Doki, Yuko Kitagawa, Hiroya Takeuchi, Ken Shirabe, Yasuyuki Seto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yoshihiro KakejiDivision of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku,Kobe, 650-0017, Japan. kakeji@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-2727-0241
Hiroyuki YamamotoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki WatanabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji KonoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Hideki UenoDepartment of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ken ShirabeDepartment of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan.
Yasuyuki SetoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is a highly invasive gastrointestinal surgical procedure. The National Clinical Database (NCD) of Japan, initiated in 2011, has compiled real-world data on esophagectomy, one of nine major gastroenterological surgeries. This review examines outcomes after esophagectomy analyzed using the Japanese big databases. Certification systems by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery (JSGS) and the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) have shown that institutional certification has a greater impact on short-term surgical outcomes than surgeon certification. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has emerged as a viable alternative to open esophagectomy, although careful patient selection is crucial, especially for elderly patients with advanced tumors. The NCD has significantly contributed to the assessment and enhancement of surgical quality and short-term outcomes, while studies based on Comprehensive Registry of Esophageal Cancer in Japan (CRECJ) have provided data on patient characteristics, treatments, and long-term outcomes. The JES has conducted various questionnaire-based retrospective clinical reviews in collaboration with authorized institutions certified by JES. The Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database provides administrative claims data including itemized prices for surgical, pharmaceutical, laboratory, and other inpatient services. Analyzing these nationwide databases can offer precise insights into surgical quality for esophageal cancer, potentially leading to improved treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyAgedCertificationFemaleHumansJapanMaleMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CareRegistriesTreatment OutcomeDPCEsophagectomyMorbidityMortalityNCD

Identifiers

PMID39158676
PMCPMC11405450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.