Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158621›Full record

ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2024

A review on advancements in feature selection and feature extraction for high-dimensional NGS data analysis.

Kasmika Borah, Himanish Shekhar Das, Soumita Seth, Koushik Mallick, Zubair Rahaman, Saurav Mallik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kasmika BorahDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, 781001, Assam, India.
Himanish Shekhar DasDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, 781001, Assam, India. himanish.das@cottonuniversity.ac.in.
Soumita SethDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Future Institute of Engineering and Management, Narendrapur, Kolkata, 700150, West Bengal, India.
Koushik MallickDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, RCC Institute of Information Technology, Canal S Rd, Beleghata, Kolkata, 700015, West Bengal, India.
Zubair RahamanVitas Healthcare, Kissimmee, FL, USA.
Saurav MallikDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. smallik@hsph.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in biomedical technologies and the proliferation of high-dimensional Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) datasets have led to significant growth in the bulk and density of data. The NGS high-dimensional data, characterized by a large number of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metagenomics features relative to the number of biological samples, presents significant challenges for reducing feature dimensionality. The high dimensionality of NGS data poses significant challenges for data analysis, including increased computational burden, potential overfitting, and difficulty in interpreting results. Feature selection and feature extraction are two pivotal techniques employed to address these challenges by reducing the dimensionality of the data, thereby enhancing model performance, interpretability, and computational efficiency. Feature selection and feature extraction can be categorized into statistical and machine learning methods. The present study conducts a comprehensive and comparative review of various statistical, machine learning, and deep learning-based feature selection and extraction techniques specifically tailored for NGS and microarray data interpretation of humankind. A thorough literature search was performed to gather information on these techniques, focusing on array-based and NGS data analysis. Various techniques, including deep learning architectures, machine learning algorithms, and statistical methods, have been explored for microarray, bulk RNA-Seq, and single-cell, single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) technology-based datasets surveyed here. The study provides an overview of these techniques, highlighting their applications, advantages, and limitations in the context of high-dimensional NGS data. This review provides better insights for readers to apply feature selection and feature extraction techniques to enhance the performance of predictive models, uncover underlying biological patterns, and gain deeper insights into massive and complex NGS and microarray data.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMachine LearningDeep LearningHumansDimensionality ReductionFeature ExtractionFeature SelectionNext Generation Sequencing data

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.