ReviewFunctional & integrative genomics2024
A review on advancements in feature selection and feature extraction for high-dimensional NGS data analysis.
Review in Functional & integrative genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications and challenges of biomarker-based predictive models in proactive health management.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic detection of predictive gene sets by semantics-based selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- BaGGLS: a Bayesian shrinkage framework for interpretable modeling of interactions in high-dimensional biological data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Sensor Array and SMOTE-Based Algorithms for Volatile-Fingerprint Classification of Pesticide-Treated Soil with a Novel Chamber.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of feature selection methods for HRV-based survival modeling in HIV-positive ICU patients: a retrospective study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Identification of novel biomarkers and drug targets for frailty-related skeletal muscle aging: a multi-omics study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2025Article
- A computationally efficient approach to false discovery rate control and power maximisation via randomisation and mirror statistic.Statistical methods in medical research · 2025Article
- Algorithms and tools for data-driven omics integration to achieve multilayer biological insights: a narrative review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- DOMSCNet: a deep learning model for the classification of stomach cancer using multi-layer omics data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- An overview on olfaction in the biological, analytical, computational, and machine learning fields.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of dimensionality reduction techniques for EEG-based emotional state classification.American journal of neurodegenerative disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in biomedical technologies and the proliferation of high-dimensional Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) datasets have led to significant growth in the bulk and density of data. The NGS high-dimensional data, characterized by a large number of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metagenomics features relative to the number of biological samples, presents significant challenges for reducing feature dimensionality. The high dimensionality of NGS data poses significant challenges for data analysis, including increased computational burden, potential overfitting, and difficulty in interpreting results. Feature selection and feature extraction are two pivotal techniques employed to address these challenges by reducing the dimensionality of the data, thereby enhancing model performance, interpretability, and computational efficiency. Feature selection and feature extraction can be categorized into statistical and machine learning methods. The present study conducts a comprehensive and comparative review of various statistical, machine learning, and deep learning-based feature selection and extraction techniques specifically tailored for NGS and microarray data interpretation of humankind. A thorough literature search was performed to gather information on these techniques, focusing on array-based and NGS data analysis. Various techniques, including deep learning architectures, machine learning algorithms, and statistical methods, have been explored for microarray, bulk RNA-Seq, and single-cell, single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) technology-based datasets surveyed here. The study provides an overview of these techniques, highlighting their applications, advantages, and limitations in the context of high-dimensional NGS data. This review provides better insights for readers to apply feature selection and feature extraction techniques to enhance the performance of predictive models, uncover underlying biological patterns, and gain deeper insights into massive and complex NGS and microarray data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39158621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.