ArticleCardiology journal2024
Zero-fluoroscopy catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions: comparative outcomes from the right ventricular outflow tract and other ventricular sites.
Article in Cardiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero-Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional Catheter Ablation for Premature Ventricular Contractions.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- Predictive value of surface electrocardiogram in localizing right ventricular outflow tract premature beats: a study combining intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomical mapping under all-zero fluoroscopy ablation.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system allows performing catheter ablation (CA) without fluoroscopy in patients with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) location is favorable for performing zero-fluoroscopy CA. Non-RVOT zero-fluoroscopy CA is a challenging procedure. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zero-fluoroscopy CA using the EAM in patients with PVCs from RVOT and non-RVOT.
methodsCompletely zero-fluoroscopy CA of PVCs guided by EAM was performed in 107 patients with PVCs. 54 patients underwent zero-fluoroscopy RVOT CA. The remaining 53 patients underwent zero-fluoroscopy non-RVOT CA. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics, procedure parameters, and follow-up were obtained from medical records. Primary outcomes were the acute and the permanent success rate (12-month follow-up), complications, and procedure time.
resultsThere were no significant differences between groups regarding baseline characteristics. Acute procedural success was achieved in 52 patients (94,44%) in the RVOT zero-fluoroscopy CA group and in 45 patients (86,54%) in the non-RVOT zero-fluoroscopy CA group (ns). A long-term success rate was achieved in 50 patients (90,74%) in the RVOT zero-fluoroscopy CA group and in 44 patients (84,62%) in the non-RVOT zero-fluoroscopy CA group (ns). The median procedure time was 80.5 minutes in the RVOT group and 90 minutes in the non-RVOT group (ns). There were two complications in the non-RVOT group (ns).
conclusionsThere were no differences in procedure time efficacy and safety zero-fluoroscopy ablation between RVOT and non-RVOT locations. Non-fluoroscopy CA of PVCs is a feasible, safe, and efficient procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.