Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158413›Full record

ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2024

Advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation: A comprehensive review of efficacy and safety.

Diala Haykal, Hugues Cartier, David Goldberg, Michael Gold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cutaneous Aging in Skin of Color: A Narrative Review.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Pipeline of Devices and Aesthetics: What Is Left?The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diala HaykalCentre Laser Palaiseau, Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-5088
Hugues CartierCentre Médical Saint Jean, Arras, France.
David GoldbergDirector of Cosmetic Dermatology and Clinical Research, Schweiger Dermatology Group, Clinical Professor of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8950-439X
Michael GoldGold Skin Care Center, Tennessee Clinical Research Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5183-5433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaser technology has fundamentally transformed the landscape of dermatology, offering nuanced solutions for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing. This paper aims to explore the spectrum of laser technologies, from ablative to non-ablative and fractional lasers, their mechanisms, benefits, and tailored applications for diverse skin conditions. As we delve into the intricacies of each technology, we also consider the scientific advancements that have made these treatments safer and more effective, promising a new horizon in skin rejuvenation.

objectiveThis comprehensive analysis seeks to evaluate recent advancements in laser technology for skin rejuvenation, focusing on efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction.

methodsThe selection criteria for studies in this publication focused on recent, peer-reviewed articles from the last 20 years, emphasizing advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation. Our comprehensive review involved searches in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Google Scholar using keywords like "skin rejuvenation," "laser technology," "efficacy," "safety," and "dermatology." This approach focused on inclusion of recent research and perspectives on the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in the field of dermatology.

resultsOur literature review reveals advancements in laser skin resurfacing technologies, notably fractional lasers for minimal downtime rejuvenation, ablative lasers for precise tissue vaporization, and non-ablative lasers for coagulation effect promoting collagen with reduced recovery. Hybrid and picosecond lasers are highlighted for their versatility and effectiveness in addressing a wide array of skin concerns. The findings also emphasize the development of safer treatment protocols for ethnic skin, significantly reducing risks like hyperpigmentation and scarring, thus broadening the scope of effective dermatological solutions.

conclusionThis extensive review of advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation underscores a remarkable evolution in dermatological treatments, offering an expansive overview of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with these interventions. Furthermore, the exploration of combination treatments and laser-assisted drug delivery represents a frontier in dermatological practice, offering synergistic effects that could amplify the therapeutic benefits of laser treatments.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesLaser TherapyRejuvenationSkin AgingHumansPatient SatisfactionSkinTreatment Outcomedermatologyefficacylaser technologysafetyskin rejuvenation

Identifiers

PMID39158413
PMCPMC13649091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.