Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158357›Full record

ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

Baseline MRI Examination in the NAKO Health Study—Findings on Feasibility, Participation and Dropout Rates, Comfort, and Image Quality.

Fabian Bamberg, Christopher L Schlett, Svenja Caspers, Steffen Ringhof, Matthias Günther, Jochen G Hirsch, Julia Rüdebusch, Pavlína Miklánková, Nora Bittner, Christiane Jockwitz and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the German National Cohort (NAKO): Automated segmentation of short-axis cine images and post-processing quality control.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Fabian BambergDepartment of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Christopher L SchlettDepartment of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Svenja CaspersInstitute for Anatomy I, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Germany
Steffen RinghofDepartment of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
Matthias GüntherFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen,Germany
Jochen G HirschFraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Bremen,Germany
Julia RüdebuschInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medical Center Greifswald, Germany
Pavlína MiklánkováDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
Nora BittnerInstitute for Anatomy I, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Germany
Christiane JockwitzInstitute for Anatomy I, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Germany
Michael ForstingInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology,University Medical Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Norbert HostenInstitute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Greifswald, Germany
Rudolph KaaksDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Germany
Hans-Ulrich KauczorDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
Thomas KroenkeDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Germany
Thoralf NiendorfBerlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Gesellschaft (MDC), Berlin, Germany
Annette PetersInstitute for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Center Munich - German Research Center for Health and the Environment, Neuherberg, Germany
Tobias PischonMolecular Epidemiology Research Group, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Gesellschaft (MDC), Berlin, Germany
Andreas StangInstitute for Medical Informatics, Biometrics, and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Klaus BergerInstitute for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Münster, Germany
Henry VölzkeInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medical Center Greifswald, Germany
NAKO Investigators Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yields important information on the development and current status of many different diseases. Whole-body MRI was accordingly made a part of the multicenter, population-based NAKO Health Study. The present analysis concerns the feasibility of the baseline MRI examination and various aspects of quality assurance over the period 2014-2019.

methods32 252 participants in the NAKO Health Study, aged 20 to 74, who had no contraindication to MRI were invited to undergo scanning in one of five MRI study centers across Germany. The whole-body MRI scan took about one hour and consisted of sequences for the visualization of structural and functional features of the brain, musculoskeletal system, cardiovascular system, and thoracoabdominal system. A comprehensive quality-assurance assessment was carried out, with evaluation of adverse events, the completeness of the MRI protocols, the participants' subjective perceptions, and image quality.

results31 578 participants (97.9%) were successfully included in the MRI study. They reported a high level of comfort and suffered no severe adverse events (mild adverse events occurred in only four participants). Depending on the imaging sequence, the image quality was rated as excellent in 80.2% to 96.8% of cases. Quality assessment with respect to structural features of the brain revealed high consistency across study centers, as well as with regard to age- and sex-based differences in brain volume (men, 1203.81 ± 102.06 cm³; women, 1068.10 ± 86.69 cm³).

conclusionWhole-body MRI was successfully implemented in the NAKO baseline examination and was associated with high patient comfort and very good image quality. The imaging biomarkers of the brain confirmed previously observed differences based on age and sex, underscoring the feasibility of data pooling.

Indexed as

Feasibility StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedWhole Body ImagingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39158357
PMCPMC11661488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.