Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158356›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2024

Phylogenomics and Pervasive Genome-Wide Phylogenetic Discordance Among Fin Whales (Balaenoptera physalus).

Fabricio Furni, Eduardo R Secchi, Camilla Speller, Daniel DenDanto, Christian Ramp, Finn Larsen, Sally Mizroch, Jooke Robbins, Richard Sears, Jorge Urbán R and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fabricio FurniMarine Evolution and Conservation Group, Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2578-2753
Eduardo R SecchiLaboratório de Ecologia e Conservação da Megafauna Marinha, Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande-FURG, Rio Grande, Brasil.
Camilla SpellerDepartment of Anthropology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Daniel DenDantoAllied Whale, College of the Atlantic, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Christian RampMingan Island Cetacean Study Inc., St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada.
Finn LarsenNational Institute of Aquatic Resources, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sally MizrochNational Marine Mammal Laboratory, US National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jooke RobbinsCenter for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, MAUSA.
Richard SearsMingan Island Cetacean Study Inc., St. Lambert, Quebec, Canada.
Jorge Urbán RDepartamento de Ciencias Marinas y Costeras, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México.
Martine BérubéMarine Evolution and Conservation Group, Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Per J PalsbøllMarine Evolution and Conservation Group, Groningen Institute of Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenomics has the power to uncover complex phylogenetic scenarios across the genome. In most cases, no single topology is reflected across the entire genome as the phylogenetic signal differs among genomic regions due to processes, such as introgression and incomplete lineage sorting. Baleen whales are among the largest vertebrates on Earth with a high dispersal potential in a relatively unrestricted habitat, the oceans. The fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) is one of the most enigmatic baleen whale species, currently divided into four subspecies. It has been a matter of debate whether phylogeographic patterns explain taxonomic variation in fin whales. Here we present a chromosome-level whole genome analysis of the phylogenetic relationships among fin whales from multiple ocean basins. First, we estimated concatenated and consensus phylogenies for both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. The consensus phylogenies based upon the autosomal genome uncovered monophyletic clades associated with each ocean basin, aligning with the current understanding of subspecies division. Nevertheless, discordances were detected in the phylogenies based on the Y chromosome, mitochondrial genome, autosomal genome and X chromosome. Furthermore, we detected signs of introgression and pervasive phylogenetic discordance across the autosomal genome. This complex phylogenetic scenario could be explained by a puzzle of introgressive events, not yet documented in fin whales. Similarly, incomplete lineage sorting and low phylogenetic signal could lead to such phylogenetic discordances. Our study reinforces the pitfalls of relying on concatenated or single locus phylogenies to determine taxonomic relationships below the species level by illustrating the underlying nuances that some phylogenetic approaches may fail to capture. We emphasize the significance of accurate taxonomic delineation in fin whales by exploring crucial information revealed through genome-wide assessments.

Indexed as

Fin WhaleGenomePhylogenyAnimalsGenome, MitochondrialDiscordancefin whaleincomplete lineage sortingintrogressionsubspecieswhole genomes

Identifiers

PMID39158356
PMCPMC11637684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.