Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158275›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2024

Microbiology of human spaceflight: microbial responses to mechanical forces that impact health and habitat sustainability.

Cheryl A Nickerson, Robert J C McLean, Jennifer Barrila, Jiseon Yang, Starla G Thornhill, Laura L Banken, D Marshall Porterfield, George Poste, Neal R Pellis, C Mark Ott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Biofilms: from the cradle of life to life support.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Storage stability ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cheryl A NickersonSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9804-9739
Robert J C McLeanDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0610-6143
Jennifer BarrilaBiodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6597-3001
Jiseon YangBiodesign Center for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Starla G ThornhillJES Tech, Houston, Texas, USA.
Laura L BankenSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
D Marshall PorterfieldDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
George PosteComplex Adaptive Systems Initiative, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Neal R PellisBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
C Mark OttBiomedical Research and Environmental Sciences Division, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3101-4806

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC18K1478National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC19K1597National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC20K0016National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC21K1024National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC22K1361National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NNX17AC79GNational Science Foundation (NSF) 2224449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SUMMARYUnderstanding the dynamic adaptive plasticity of microorganisms has been advanced by studying their responses to extreme environments. Spaceflight research platforms provide a unique opportunity to study microbial characteristics in new extreme adaptational modes, including sustained exposure to reduced forces of gravity and associated low fluid shear force conditions. Under these conditions, unexpected microbial responses occur, including alterations in virulence, antibiotic and stress resistance, biofilm formation, metabolism, motility, and gene expression, which are not observed using conventional experimental approaches. Here, we review biological and physical mechanisms that regulate microbial responses to spaceflight and spaceflight analog environments from both the microbe and host-microbe perspective that are relevant to human health and habitat sustainability. We highlight instrumentation and technology used in spaceflight microbiology experiments, their limitations, and advances necessary to enable next-generation research. As spaceflight experiments are relatively rare, we discuss ground-based analogs that mimic aspects of microbial responses to reduced gravity in spaceflight, including those that reduce mechanical forces of fluid flow over cell surfaces which also simulate conditions encountered by microorganisms during their terrestrial lifecycles. As spaceflight mission durations increase with traditional astronauts and commercial space programs send civilian crews with underlying health conditions, microorganisms will continue to play increasingly critical roles in health and habitat sustainability, thus defining a new dimension of occupational health. The ability of microorganisms to adapt, survive, and evolve in the spaceflight environment is important for future human space endeavors and provides opportunities for innovative biological and technological advances to benefit life on Earth.

Indexed as

EcosystemSpace FlightAdaptation, PhysiologicalBacteriaBiofilmsHumansWeightlessnessastronautfluid shearhabitatmechanobiologymechanotransductionmicrogravityspacecraftspaceflight

Identifiers

PMID39158275
PMCPMC11426028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.