ReviewJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2024
Application of Second-Generation Sequencing Technology in Lower Respiratory Tract Infection.
Review in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Evaluation of Multiple Droplet Digital PCR Method for Specific Detection and Differentiation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Application value of next generation sequencing technology for pathogen detection in patients with pulmonary infection and lung cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Article
- The Research Progress of Single-Molecule Sequencing and Its Significance in Nucleic Acid Metrology.Biosensors · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) has long been an important threat to people's life and health, so the rapid diagnosis of LRTI is of great significance in clinical treatment. In recent years, the development of the sequencing technology provides a new direction for the rapid diagnosis of LRTI. In this review, the advantages and disadvantages of second-generation sequencing techniques represented by metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in LRTI were reviewed. Furthermore, it offers insights into the future trajectory of this technology, highlighting its potential to revolutionise the field of respiratory infection diagnostics.
objectiveThis review summarises developments in mechanistic research of second-generation sequencing technology their relationship with clinical practice, providing insights for future research.
methodsAuthors conducted a search on PubMed and Web of Science using the professional terms 'Lower respiratory tract infection' and 'droplet digital polymerase chain reaction' and 'metagenomics next generation sequencing'. The obtained literature was then roughly categorised based on their research content. Similar studies were grouped into the same sections, and further searches were conducted based on the keywords of each section.
resultsDifferent studies discussed the application of second-generation sequencing technology in LRTI from different angles, including the detection of pathogens of LRTI by mNGS and ddPCR, the prediction ability of drug-resistant bacteria, and comparison with traditional methods. We try to analyse the advantages and disadvantages of the second-generation sequencing technology by combing the research results of mNGS and ddPCR. In addition, the development direction of the second-generation sequencing technology is prospected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.