Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39158006›Full record

ArticleWestern journal of nursing research2024

Nurturing Longitudinal Samples 2.0.

Alexa K Stuifbergen, Heather Becker, Vicki Kullberg, Oxana Palesh, Shelli R Kesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Western journal of nursing research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexa K StuifbergenThe University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1609-4040
Heather BeckerThe University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, TX, USA.
Vicki KullbergThe University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, TX, USA.
Oxana PaleshVirginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
Shelli R KeslerThe University of Texas at Austin School of Nursing, Austin, TX, USA.

Funding

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Brief Behavioral Therapy for Cancer Related InsomniaR01CA239714 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI PALESH, OXANA G · 2020 to 2025
$4.5M
Very-long Term Neurocognitive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors (ProbC2)R01CA172145 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, PALESH, OXANA G · 2012 to 2024
$3.3M
Health Promotion and Quality of Life in Chronic IllnessR01NR003195 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI STUIFBERGEN, ALEXA · 1999 to 2009
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172145NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239714NINR NIH HHS R01 NR003195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile longitudinal designs can provide significant advantages compared to single measurement/cross sectional designs, they require careful attention to study infrastructure and the risk of attrition among the sample over multiple time points.

objectiveThe strategies used to design and manage an appropriate infrastructure for a longitudinal study and approaches to retain samples are explored using examples from 2 studies, a 25-year study of persons living with multiple sclerosis and a 10-year longitudinal follow-up of breast cancer survivors.

resultsKey strategies (developing appropriate infrastructure, minimizing costs to participants, and maximizing rewards of study participation) have helped address the serious threat of attrition in these longitudinal samples.

conclusionImplementation of these strategies can help mitigate some of the disadvantages and leverage the strengths of longitudinal research to produce reliable, insightful, and impactful outcomes.

Indexed as

Research DesignBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMultiple Sclerosisattritionlongitudinal designsresearch designsamples

Identifiers

PMID39158006
PMCPMC11528941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.