Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157988›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2024

Refining urine collection in mice: Development of an innovative urine collection device.

Mélodie Douté, Céline Monzali, Antonino Nicoletti, Giuseppina Caligiuri, Marc Clement

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Practical, Noninvasive Urine Collection Method for Mice for Large Cohort Preclinical Studies.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mélodie DoutéUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, LVTS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-9718
Céline MonzaliAnimalliance, Paris, France.
Antonino NicolettiUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, LVTS, Paris, France.
Giuseppina CaligiuriUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, LVTS, Paris, France.
Marc ClementUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, INSERM, LVTS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6479-8360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urine collection can be challenging in studies involving small rodents like mice, as the actual methods of collection are anxiogenic and constrain animal welfare while having high variability in the volume of urine collected. To improve the current methods and eventually reduce the impact on the well-being of mice, we developed an innovative 3D-printed urine collection device (UCD). This two-compartment UCD is shaped to fit in classical husbandry cages and allows urine collection by spontaneous urination from two mice housed in their own cage without cross-contamination while enabling potential social interactions. We used our UCD to study the evolution of urinary parameters related to renal functions in a model of antibody-mediated chronic kidney disease. Overall, we report here a time-saving and affordable method for urine collection providing a large amount of uncontaminated urine and which we believe may improve animal welfare in comparison with other methods.

Indexed as

Urine Specimen CollectionAnimalsAnimal WelfareFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrinting, Three-DimensionalEthics and welfareexperimental designin vivoorganisms and modelsrefinementrodentstechniquesurine collection

Identifiers

PMID39157988
PMCPMC11633060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.