Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39157922›Full record

ArticleBiology open2024

Winging it: hummingbirds alter flying kinematics during molt.

Andrés F Díaz-Salazar, Felipe Garzón-Agudelo, Ashley Smiley, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Alejandro Rico-Guevara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrés F Díaz-SalazarLaboratorio de Biología Evolutiva de Vertebrados, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18 A 10, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0008-7346-1787
Felipe Garzón-AgudeloColibrí Gorriazul Research Center, Fusagasugá, Cundinamarca 252217, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4195-464X
Ashley SmileyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3040 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3537-104X
Carlos Daniel CadenaLaboratorio de Biología Evolutiva de Vertebrados, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No. 18 A 10, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4530-2478
Alejandro Rico-GuevaraDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4067-5312

Funding

Universidad de los AndesUniversity of WashingtonWashington Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hummingbirds are well known for their hovering flight, one of the most energetically expensive modes of locomotion among animals. Molt is a costly event in the annual cycle, in which birds replace their feathers, including all their primary feathers, which, in hummingbirds, comprise most of the area of the wing. Despite this, the effects of molt on hovering flight are not well known. Here, we examined high-speed videos (14 individuals of three species from the Colombian Andes recorded at 1200 frames per second) comparing molting and non-molting hummingbirds' wing kinematics and wingtip trajectories. We found that molting hummingbirds rotated their wings in more acute angles during both downstroke and upstroke compared to non-molting individuals (10° versus 20°, and 15° versus 29°, respectively), while other flight parameters remained unchanged. Our findings show that hummingbirds are capable of sustaining hovering flight and thereby maintaining their weight support even under impressive wing area reductions by adjusting their stroke amplitudes.

Indexed as

BirdsFlight, AnimalMoltingWings, AnimalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFeathersAnnual cycleFlight kinematicsHoveringHummingbirdsLiftMolt

Identifiers

PMID39157922
PMCPMC11583918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.